“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: How America’s Working Stiffs Got Stiffed
What Was the Point of Regime Change in Iraq?
Lindsey’s Plan for War on Iran
FISA-Gate: The Plot To Destroy Our Republic
Stat of the Day: Tuition Discount Rate
German Government Takes Off Mask, Emerges As Fascist Dictatorship
‘Don’t Follow the Fed’ Will Be the Smart Money’s New Slogan
Gun Rights Helped Blacks During Civil Rights Movement
Bitcoin: Objections and Replies
Bill Bonner: Sell the House, Sell the Car, Sell the Kids…
Paul Craig Roberts: More Misleading Official Employment Statistics
Now Obama wants your 401(k)
How Do Ponzi Schemes End?
Dictator for Life: The Rise of the American Imperial President
How, Exactly, Does A Travel Ban Keep Us Safe?