“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
Andrew J. Napolitano: War and the Separation of Powers
How Many Times Can the Fed Play this Hand?
Patent “Trolls” are Bad. Patents are Worse.
What Everyone Is Missing About Trump’s Military Parade
Interventionists Should Hang Their Heads in Shame
US Egypt Policies Don't Pass the Laugh Test
Jim Rogers: At What Price You Should Start Buying Gold
Report on CIA Torture Methods and Renditions
Wrongfully Imprisoned for 31 Years, and This is Considered Justice?
European Plastic Straw Ban Won't Save the Oceans
Ron Paul: Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston
Not Speedy + Not Public = Not Legal
U.S. Losing the GWOT
Silver: CONFIRMED at $25
Trump's holiday gift is more invasive airport security
