“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Short Circuiting The Market
IRS Scandal: And They Shall Eat Their Own ...
Washington frets over Saudi ties
Bill Bonner: 'Return to Zombieland'
Syria supports Kurdish self-rule vote that US labels 'illegitimate'
Bravo Britain
The Most Dangerous Conspiracy of All Time
Greek Dilemma: A Product of the Dialectic
Sanctions on Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Jordan?
Bernanke's Plan...If He Identifies Bubbles
Jacob Hornberger: Memorial Day Is Based On A Lie
The Real Reason to Welcome Secession
Jamie Dimon Knows What You Don't Need to Know About U.S. Default
Americans Aren’t Buying the Media’s Push For A War In Syria
The Deceptive Debate Over What Causes Terrorism Against the West