“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: What You NEED to Know about Wealth Inequality
Public Sector Pensions Are a National Issue
Government Tattoo Statists of America
Eric Margolis: Spying Run Amok
Will Europe pay the price for one-sided U.S. financial information demands?
Judge Napolitano On Why You Should Be Upset About Govt Requesting Record Amount of Google Email Data
The Disappearing Gold
Destroying the Switzerland of Central America
An Open Letter to the FBI
Peter Schiff: Protecting Workers "Rights" Protects Them From Getting Jobs
How The News Media Betrayed Us On Iraq
Edward Snowden and Joshua Glover
War in Syria: Madness on the Potomac
Paul Craig Roberts: Spinning Bad Financial News Into Good
Eric Margolis: Who Killed Benazir Bhutto?
