“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Negative mortgage rates in Denmark; $3.6 trillion of negative yield debt
Government Agencies Failed, so We Must Give Them Even More Authority
U.S. Helping Iranians With Surveillance Circumvention Technologies
Will Globalism Invade the US via its Cities? The Daily Beast Thinks So
PM Volatility Masks Impending Rise In Metals And Miners: Don't Sell Out
Wrongfully Imprisoned for 31 Years, and This is Considered Justice?
Welcome to the Real World
The Treasury Payoff
Peter Schiff: The Inevitable Collapse
U.S. Government vs. DEFCAD 3D Printable Gun: You Can’t Fix Stupid
IRS Scandal: And They Shall Eat Their Own ...
Why the White House Is Panicking About Obamacare
Lew Rockwell & Joe Salerno: War, Terror, and Banking
Bill Bonner: Gold versus paper cash
Precious Metals Paradox: Good Fundamentals Help And Hurt