“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
The UK Recovery that Isn't ... the Market Recovery that Is
Free Speech Limits to Fight ISIS Pose a Greater Threat Than ISIS
'HELP: Detroit is Waiting to be Rescued!'
Ron Paul: Pompeo and Haspel are Symptoms of a Deeper Problem
Digital Technologies vs. Truth Suppression
2 of the Worst Warmongering Neocons Demand To Know
Judge Napolitano: A Conspiracy of Silence Assaults Privacy
Ask James: Should I Be Worried About $16 Trillion In Debt?
Ron Paul: Should We Be Shocked At Government Spying?
Ron Paul: The Sequester 'Crisis' And What Should Be Done
‘Inside the law enforcement bubble’
Eric Margolis: Tensions on the Korean Peninsula
Washington may have had a hand in halting Dow meltdown
D.C.'s Walmart 'Super Minimum Wage' Is a Super Bad Idea
How Congress Snuck in a 3.8% Tax Increase that Will Kick in on Jan. 1