“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
Foreign surveillance has ordinary Americans in its sights
Bill Bonner: It's about geo-politics!
Daniel Hannan on Statism and Detroit: My Analysis
Eric Margolis: Are We Becoming What We Once Hated?
Doug Noland: Intimidate Nobody
Peter Schiff: US Could Be On A Gold Standard Within Two Years
Ron Paul: Do We Need to Bring Back Internment Camps?
Donald Trump Flaunts the Dangers of Presidential Power
Peter Schiff: 'Operation Screw: The Fed goes all-in on QE'
Portugal May Become the First of Europe’s Bankrupt Welfare States to Recover: Less Spending AND Lowe...
Do Humanitarian Concerns Give the U.S. A Right to Bomb Syria?
Sweden’s Military Madness: Conscription and Propaganda
Omnipotent Government, Not Trump, Is the Problem
Ron Paul: "People Are Waking Up"
The American Democracy Pitch
