“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
Obama admin. sends guns to Syria…without background checks
Controlled Demolition of Europe Continues
Freedom Requires Whistleblowers: The Importance of Transparency
Feds' misconduct in Cliven Bundy case stems from Ruby Ridge
Apple: iPhone Fingerprint Reader Means Government Business
Jacob Hornberger: A Glimmer of Light from Switzerland
Bill Bonner: The Fed Chief America Deserves
“Conspiracies don’t happen….here.”
Democrats Demand Reinstatement of The Draft
The Dead-Head Fed And “The Only Road to Riches”
QE3: A Risky Ploy to Solve the Problems of Bad Fiscal Policy with Bad Monetary Policy
Lavabit: The Latest Dead Canary in the Privacy Coal Mine
Oregon Standoff: Federal Land Grab vs. the Sagebrush Rebellion
Stop and Swab: Dramatic Increases in DNA Police Databases
State Department: “We cannot make India look at you as an American”