“2 years ago the president told Assad to leave office. Looking for the lowest-cost way to accomplish this objective (without explicitly using American forces), the president then supported the rebels covertly. When the rebels lost ground in the last year, the president looked for a pretext. The chemical event, no matter how it came to be, is that pretext.
Although the president has tried to sell bombing as a limited one-time event in response to a chemical event, none of the major players believes this. They know that it is an act of war. The president further acknowledges that it is an act of war by seeking congressional approval.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-an-act-of-war/
Related posts:
The Cunningness of the CIA’s JFK Assassination Cover-Up
Jacob Hornberger: Celebrating The Cuban Air Crash
Portrait of a Drone Killer: ‘I Have a Duty, and I Execute My Duty’
No Syrian War to Save Obama’s Face!
Housing, Diminishing Returns and Opportunity Cost
Home Ownership for Young Americans Is Falling. So What?
Pepe Escobar: War on terror forever
California’s Economic Suicide and other News from Yesterday’s Ballot Measures
Guantanamo Bay: The Model for an American Police State?
How a $1 Bag of Salt Water Becomes a $546 Bill at Hospitals
Obamacare: A Racket for Overpaid Government Bureaucrats
Extraordinary Directed History of the WTO Trade Breakthrough
EU Financial Tax Portends Loss of Market Leadership
Argentina offers tax amnesty to head off devaluation
Jacob Hornberger: Cold War Fearmongering on Cuba and Korea
