“2 years ago the president told Assad to leave office. Looking for the lowest-cost way to accomplish this objective (without explicitly using American forces), the president then supported the rebels covertly. When the rebels lost ground in the last year, the president looked for a pretext. The chemical event, no matter how it came to be, is that pretext.
Although the president has tried to sell bombing as a limited one-time event in response to a chemical event, none of the major players believes this. They know that it is an act of war. The president further acknowledges that it is an act of war by seeking congressional approval.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-an-act-of-war/
(Visited 33 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: No Real Recovery Without "Hitting Bottom" First...
Farewell to Big Sister: Janet Napolitano’s Orwellian Legacy Lives On
Bill Bonner: The Fed Can’t Stop What’s Coming
Antiwar.com's Justin Raimondo on Rand Paul, President Obama, Murray Rothbard and Much More
Nigel Farage: This Is My Greatest Worry As We Head Into 2013
Cliven Bundy-FBI debacle: Another example of why Feds need to be leashed
Bill Bonner: Are Pope Francis, Bill De Blasio and Barack Obama Right?
Bill Bonner: All Hell Breaks Loose!
This is the Moment
The Economist Hoists Its Battle Balloon?
A Bad Argument for Bombing Syria
Bill Bonner: Debunking the Fed’s Credit Propaganda
Bill Bonner: The Dumbest Investment Mistake You Can Make
Do Citizens Have the Responsibility to Protect the Police?
Fury at the American Raj