“2 years ago the president told Assad to leave office. Looking for the lowest-cost way to accomplish this objective (without explicitly using American forces), the president then supported the rebels covertly. When the rebels lost ground in the last year, the president looked for a pretext. The chemical event, no matter how it came to be, is that pretext.
Although the president has tried to sell bombing as a limited one-time event in response to a chemical event, none of the major players believes this. They know that it is an act of war. The president further acknowledges that it is an act of war by seeking congressional approval.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-an-act-of-war/
Related posts:
CNN Poll Finds 55% Support Marijuana Legalization
Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Thinks You Are Stupid
Abolish All Government Economic Data Collection
Two FBI officials say the state of forensics is fine. Here’s why they’re wrong.
Sandy Hook Massacre: Sympathy from the Devil
Nothing Succeeds Like ‘Success’ - Justin Raimondo
Bernanke, Coolidge, and Buchanan: On Timing Your Departure
Paul Craig Roberts: Obama’s Expanding Kill List
NYC’s Plan To Round Up Mentally Ill People Who Are Not Taking Court-Ordered Medication
The Trillion Dollar Coin Is a Great Idea!
US Attorney files dismissal of Swartz’s case, refuses to comment on his death
New $15 Million Bitcoin VC Fund Seeks Edge with Regulatory, Security Skills
Brandon Raub and the Thought Police
7 Things I Am More Concerned About Than a Terrorist Attack
Banish the trolls, but web debate still needs anonymity
