“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
A $100k earner gets to keep $99k in Singapore but $57k in San Francisco
It’s Up to You, Entrepreneurs: Brad Feld on the Rise of Global Startup Communities
Will Grigg: The Stalinist in the White House
Bitcoin: $1,000,000 Bet Final Update!
Freedom or the Slaughterhouse? The American Police State from A to Z
The Great Default: Taxpayers Cannot Grow Their Way Out of Government's Problem
South Africa and Ending Apartheid: The Free-Market Road Not Taken
The State, Not Manning, is the Criminal
Sticky Thoughts: The Market, Not The Government, Gave Us Super Glue
Why the Government Is Desperately Trying to Inflate a New Housing Bubble
Sibel Edmonds Explains Who's At The Top Of The Pyramid
Bitcoin: The People's Money with Roger Ver and Jeffrey Tucker
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught
America's Energy Boom and the Rising U.S. Dollar
Niall Ferguson: Networks and Hierarchies