“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
Crooked Judges Want Your Kids for Cash
Ruby Ridge: The Age of State Terrorism Begins
Doug Casey on Opting-Out
9/11 happens every day to war torn nations
The Shocking Real Reason for FATCA, and What Comes Next
Will Grigg: Prison Profiteers
Seeking a Bolthole Community
Jeffrey Tucker: Canada: Land of the Freer?
The Panthers Were Right and Reagan Was Wrong on Gun Control
Why Is Not-Pot Illegal Too?
The Voters Who Stayed Home
3 Reasons the ‘Nothing to Hide’ Crowd Should Be Worried About Government Surveillance
Present Shock and the Fantasy of Change
How to Be a YouTube Star and Beat Justin Timberlake in the Charts
Liberty, NORML and Marijuana Legalization vs. Decriminalization