“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
How the CIA Helped Disney Conquer Florida
Doug French: Signs That It’s Time to Head for the Exits
Using Metadata to Find Paul Revere
Egypt, Syria - it's just the end of them
The End of Private Property in the Era of the American Police State
Why I Charge $1,000 For An Hour Of My Time
The Final Nail in the Coffin: The Death of Freedom in Our Schools
From Africa to Anadarko, a Story of Love and Markets
The Border-Industrial Complex Goes Abroad
The Power Elite-Obama Connection
Bill Bonner: Price does not tell you all you need to know
Glenn Greenwald: David Frum, the Iraq war and oil
Cyprus, The First Domino?
How Bitcoin solved my startup's international banking problem
How the Nazis Used Gun Control