“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
What If Stocks, Bonds and Housing All Go Down Together?
Why I Charge $1,000 For An Hour Of My Time
The Source of Systemic Crisis: Risk and Moral Hazard
Cowardice Redefined: The New Face of American Serial Killers
American Banksterism Through the Ages
Karl Hess: Tools to Dismantle the State
Wendy McElroy: Measuring the Extent of a Police State
Five Reasons Washington Should Leave Bitcoin Alone
Jeffrey Tucker: Is There A Viable Alternative To College?
Will the Federal Reserve Taper Off on QE?
How to Spot a Market Top
The Death of Privacy
Eleanor Roosevelt’s Snippy Letter to Dorothy Day [2011]
John Whitehead, The FBI: The Silent Terror of the Fourth Reich
Why Bond Market Bulls Are About to Get Crushed