“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Roving Bandit, Stationary Bandit, and Income Tax
Ron Paul: After 100 Years Of Failure, It's Time To End The Fed
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
Who Are the Power Elite?
Obamacare and the New Soviet Man
Could Bitcoin (or equivalent) Become a Global Reserve Currency?
How to offshore your credit card with China’s Unionpay
How crossing the US-Mexico border became a crime [2017]
The 7 Choices Left to the Military-Industrial Complex
A territorial tax system would help U.S. exports, jobs and prosperity
$179,000 Each--In Debt
Why US government IT fails so hard, so often
Support the Egyptian Uprising and Go to Jail
Bill Bonner: The war on the young
James Bovard: The FBI’s Forgotten Criminal Record