“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
California, Here They Go
Walter Williams: Why Aren't Murderous Communists Condemned Like Nazis Are?
Internet Fascism and the Surveillance State
Why you can't run Bitcoin apps on your iPhone?
Why I renounced US citizenship
"The Biggest Growth Opportunity in the History of Capitalism"
Bitcoin, Encryption, Drug Use, and the FBI's Own Bitcoin Wallet
A Letter to America from the Son of an American
The Supreme Court’s Deference to the Pentagon
Gold and Syria
Michael Hastings: A Non-Conspiracy Theory
Why Snowden's Passport Matters
Naomi Wolf: The coming drone attack on America
How to escape from a car underwater
War Doesn’t Make Sense Anymore