“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
Central Banks and Our Dysfunctional Gold Markets
The Throwaways: Pawns in the War on Drugs
Obamacare, Stimulus, and Other Disasters
John Whitehead: ‘I am not a number. I am a free man!’
Wendy McElroy: Death by Methodological Individualism
Qatar: Rich and Dangerous
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
Swiss Freeports and the Invincible Tax Evader
Doug Casey on ISIS, Gold, Oil, and What to Expect in 2015
Bitcoin, the Darknet Economy, and the Low Over-Head Revolution
Bill Bonner: Price does not tell you all you need to know
Rome: Money, Mischief and Minted Crises
Is the War on Drugs Over?
The Liefare-Warfare State: A History Of U.S. False Flag Events
Sticky Thoughts: The Market, Not The Government, Gave Us Super Glue