“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
Why Is the U.S. Destabilizing One Country After Another?
Paul Craig Roberts: The Case of the Missing Recovery
The Criminology of Firearms
Top Terrorism Experts Say that Mass Spying Doesn’t Work to Prevent Terrorism
G. Edward Griffin on Globalism, Collectivism and the 'Right Principles'
“Intellectual Property”: This Land was Made for You an … er, for Monsanto
Michael Scheuer: Obama & Brennan - A new American-killing “Murder Inc”?
Deadly ‘swatting’ hoaxes and the dangerous conditioning of cops
Paul Craig Roberts: Coup d’etat
IMF Historian Whitewashes The Soviet Spy Career Of The Fund's Founder
The Internet Has Been Conquered: Get Busy With the Next Steps
Obamachow: Is National Food Insurance The Next Big Idea?
Doug Casey on Internationalizing Your Cash
A Shoe Tariff With a Big Footprint
Lew Rockwell: American Fascism