“There is no underlying economic theory and we have no empirical data by which to estimate the impacts on humans coming from even moderate (let alone large) increases in global temperatures. Thus when economists design computer simulations of the global climate and economy, going centuries into the future, they literally just make up relationships between hypothetical temperature increases and the corresponding percentage decrease in the global GDP. Then, in an excellent illustration of ‘groupthink,’ the creators of these made-up damage functions justify them by pointing to third-party summaries done of their own (made-up) damage functions.”
Related posts:
David Galland: Answers from a Monetary Master
Libertarian Perspective on Switzerland
San Francisco still has a seedy heart
Bill Bonner: Too Much of a Good Thing, Continued…
Doug Casey's Primer on Internationalization -- International Man
Inclusionary Zoning Makes Housing Less Affordable
Americans Are War Weary ... And The Neocons Don't Like It
How Empires Fall
Making Sense of Bitcoin
Bill Bonner: Can This Simple Trading System “Beat the Market”?
Ron Paul: The IRS and Congress Both Hold Our Liberty in Contempt
The Future of Countries
Investors, Run for Cover From the Incoming ‘Taper Bomb’
Know your rights, read the Constitution
Homeland Security Is A Racket Twice Over