“As NJ Senator Robert Menendez said at the Kerry hearing today in the Senate, Syria is about Iran. And it is for AIPAC too. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee broke its silence today, urging a vote for the Syrian strike. AIPAC was lying low. That was what everyone said. So: Who called AIPAC? And: why does Obama need AIPAC? Could it be because AIPAC can get 70 Senators’ signatures on a napkin in 24 hours? Also, if the Tea Party is so ‘isolationist,’ as the media keep insisting, then why is Marco Rubio gungho on a Syria attack? Does it have anything to do with presidential ambitions?”
Related posts:
Yellen Says Negative Rates On The Table "If Outlook Worsened"
Demo of Liberty Kiosk bitcoin kiosk machine
Bill Ayers: Obama should be put on trial for war crimes
Putin: Syria chemical attack is ‘rebels' provocation in hope of intervention’
How to Generate Income From the Needs of a Hungry World
Geithner Phone Pal Revealed: Larry Fink
U.S. “Humanitarian” Bombing of Iraq: A Redundant Presidential Ritual
Ex-NSA Personnel Show DNC ‘Hack’ Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job
This Is Your S&P; This Is Your S&P Without Tuesdays
New York: Facebook Can’t Challenge Demands for User Data, Or Gag Orders
Tangible Cryptography Raises $600k to Launch Bitcoin Sales Portal
Small business Obamacare online enrollment delayed a year
WikiLeaks: Council on Foreign Relations Controls Most Mainstream Media
Rick Falkvinge's 2013 List Of Stone Dead Industries
Arizona Man Holding Air Rifle Killed In His Own Backyard In Drug Raid