“As NJ Senator Robert Menendez said at the Kerry hearing today in the Senate, Syria is about Iran. And it is for AIPAC too. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee broke its silence today, urging a vote for the Syrian strike. AIPAC was lying low. That was what everyone said. So: Who called AIPAC? And: why does Obama need AIPAC? Could it be because AIPAC can get 70 Senators’ signatures on a napkin in 24 hours? Also, if the Tea Party is so ‘isolationist,’ as the media keep insisting, then why is Marco Rubio gungho on a Syria attack? Does it have anything to do with presidential ambitions?”
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Is Virgin Galactic ready for powered flight?
Arab-American Group Asks Government to Intervene in Bank Account Closures
NATO: The Broken Promise Has Backfired–Ukraine
The Bearish/Bullish Conundrum
When America Switched Sides In The War On Terror
Listen to Patraeus?
What Are Bitcoins: The How, Why and Why Not
Young Woman Arrested For Nothing, Caught On Video
Reporter: Bush ‘negligence’ ignored pre-9/11 warnings
The NSA: And Who Will Watch the Watchmen?
Shield Law Defines Journalism So That It Leaves Out Wikileaks & Bloggers
California Criminalizes Teaching Trade Skills To Dropouts
Is There a Perfect Storm for Federal Sentencing Reform?
Coin: improving credit cards, not replacing them
CA Governor Pushes Statewide Drinking Water Tax To Clean Up Farm Pollution