
“The careful wording of the government’s statements left room for supporters of military action against Syria to keep pressing for a new vote once US lawmakers have decided. Former international development minister Andrew Mitchell, a member of Cameron’s Conservative party, said nothing should be ruled out. ‘It may be, after lengthy and careful consideration, (that) Congress affirms its support for the president’s plans and, in the light of that, our parliament may want to consider this matter further,’ he told BBC radio. Cameron suffered the most humiliating defeat of his three years in power when Conservative rebels joined Labour in voting against military action by 285 to 272.”
Related posts:
American teenager designs compact nuclear reactor
Curiously, Cuba substitutes private property for communism in its new constitution
Gov. Christie Blames Regulators He Appointed for Tesla Sales Ban
Wikileaks release of TPP deal text stokes 'freedom of expression' fears
'Copblock' wiretap case goes to court in Manchester
Top U.S. Republicans back Syria strike as refugee crisis mounts
Chicago Fed President Wants Global Money Printing
Bitcoin operators resume India operations cautiously
Russia Mulls 'Limitations' On FATCA Information Exchange With U.S.
Good Genes?
Egypt’s ElBaradei: liberal with ‘troubled conscience’
MasterCard joining push for fingerprint ID standard
France will 'prove' Syria regime behind chemical attack
SEC blocks Chicago Stock Exchange sale over Chinese investor participation
U.S. to provide ‘direct military support’ to Syrian rebels