“The careful wording of the government’s statements left room for supporters of military action against Syria to keep pressing for a new vote once US lawmakers have decided. Former international development minister Andrew Mitchell, a member of Cameron’s Conservative party, said nothing should be ruled out. ‘It may be, after lengthy and careful consideration, (that) Congress affirms its support for the president’s plans and, in the light of that, our parliament may want to consider this matter further,’ he told BBC radio. Cameron suffered the most humiliating defeat of his three years in power when Conservative rebels joined Labour in voting against military action by 285 to 272.”
Related posts:
Al Qaeda militants flee Iraq's Abu Ghraib in violent mass break-out
Team Trump Walks Back Weak Dollar Talk - For Second Time This Week
Lawsuit Filed Over Fatal Police-Involved Shooting At Housing Authority
Jeffrey Tucker: The Abolition of the Playground
U.S. says oil firms should respect Baghdad government
Luxembourg and USA sign FATCA Model 1 IGA
New York Fed Agreed To Testify For Bank Of America In Exchange For $43 Million
Plainclothes deputy in unmarked car pulls gun; 5 officers attack and tase brothers
Romney Family Investment Ties To Voting Machine Company That Could Decide The Election Causing Conce...
Obama gives himself and Michelle protection by armed Secret Service agents for rest of their lives
'Mr. Yen' cautions on Japan's 'unsafe' debt trajectory
Psychologists say not joining Facebook is 'suspicious'
Police Allegedly Fire 41 Shots At Unarmed Man
California Drains Reservoirs in the Middle of a Drought [May 2014]
British Somalis dread ban of ‘herbal high’ khat