“Nancy Pelosi suggests that the U.S. should bomb Syria to save children. Does the U.S. have a right to defend children in Syria by bombing government installations? Even if some international lawyers devised some new sort of argument in support of U.S. bombing by basing it on some humanitarian rationale, the U.S. would still have a very difficult case to make. The U.S. has basically forfeited even such an imagined or hypothetical right by its earlier actions of supporting the rebel side. If it bombs Syria now, it is part of a pattern of having chosen the rebel side.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/do-humanitarian-concerns-give-the-u-s-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
Nigel Farage: Nigel Lawson calls time on the three-pint Eurosceptic heroes
Abolish ICE
Glenn Greenwald: AP's dangerous Iran hoax demands an accounting and explanation
Dangerous Organizations of the National Security State
Now Obama wants your 401(k)
Bill Bonner: A Vicious Collapse in Gold?
Glenn Greenwald: The personal side of taking on the NSA
“Stalin Would Love This…”
More Data on Why California Will Become the Next Greece
U.S. GDP Shrinks. WSJ Says 'No Reason to Panic.'
Obama Has a New 401(k) – Yours
The Really Scary Thing about the TSA
About the Federal Reserve Police
How Do Ponzi Schemes End?
Four More Years of Bush-Obama Foreign Policy, and Maybe Worse
