“An argument is being made that the credibility of the U.S. government is at stake, and that it needs to follow through on the red line threats issued by the government. But if the U.S. has been so foolish as to make threats that might diminish its credibility and harm its capacity for self-defense, it does not follow that it has now gained the privilege or right of making good on its threats. One’s mistakes or threats do not generate rights and privileges. Obama began by making the preceding credibility argument about the U.S. and his own red line threats. He has since extended that invalid argument to the ‘international community’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/does-the-u-s-government-have-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
Can We Pay a Minimum Wage That Makes Everyone Rich?
Lindsey Graham Should Have Visited Iran
How To Play The Puerto Rican Economic Recovery
Africa's Resources Beckon
Christopher Dorner and the Chaos Inherent to Government
Jacob Hornberger: Regime Change is the Root of Evil in Syria
Trump's North Korea blockade threat amounts to illegal starvation
The U.S. Will Regret Intervention in Syria
The Silent Republicans
Paul Craig Roberts: Stasi In The White House
The Tide of Power
Detroit's Future in the Face of Bankruptcy
Where Will QE3 Take Us?
Senkaku: The Islands That Launched a Thousand Ships
Glenn Greenwald: Iran sanctions now causing food insecurity, mass suffering
