“An argument is being made that the credibility of the U.S. government is at stake, and that it needs to follow through on the red line threats issued by the government. But if the U.S. has been so foolish as to make threats that might diminish its credibility and harm its capacity for self-defense, it does not follow that it has now gained the privilege or right of making good on its threats. One’s mistakes or threats do not generate rights and privileges. Obama began by making the preceding credibility argument about the U.S. and his own red line threats. He has since extended that invalid argument to the ‘international community’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/does-the-u-s-government-have-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
How Do Ponzi Schemes End?
Something’s not all right with Medicare
Peter Schiff: Gold Pullback Explained
America’s Platinum Express
Bitcoin: Hoping for the Best After Bernanke's Endorsement
Paul Craig Roberts: Will Obama Doom Himself As A War Criminal
About the Federal Reserve Police
Free Speech Limits to Fight ISIS Pose a Greater Threat Than ISIS
Is Pakistan preparing to get out of US war on terrorism?
The Fed in Danger
Faber's 'Fed Counterfeiting' Remark is Unusual but Not Extreme These Days
Part-Time Track Jobs For Mainstream Professionals?
Do Humanitarian Concerns Give the U.S. A Right to Bomb Syria?
Foreclosures are the Solution, Not the Problem
North Dakota Builds The First New Refinery In The U.S. Since 1976
