
“‘But there’s a broader problem. This administration, when it conducts foreign policy, it doesn’t do so based on U.S. national security interests… It appears what the president is pressing for is essentially protecting his public relations because he drew a red line, and essentially the bluff was called. We’re not going to resolve the tensions over there and the last thing we ought to be doing is sending our sons and daughters into harm’s way to get into the middle of this sectarian civil war,’ he added. ‘We should be focused on defending the United States of America. That’s why young men and women sign up to join the military, not to — as you know — you know, serve as Al-Qaeda’s air force.'”
Related posts:
Chris Odom on OpenTransactions
Kotlikoff on Unfunded Federal Liabilities, 2013: $205 Trillion
Don’t Expand the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: Destroy It!
Peter Schiff: Investing Wisely While Banking on a Crash
Kryptokit Launches as Dark Wallet’s Biggest Rival
WWW inventor: Government surveillance worse than outright censorship
'Economist': Europe's Politicians Need to Tame the 'Net Reformation
National I.D. By Any Other Name Still Stinks
Unhappy With U.S. Foreign Policy? Pentagon Says You Might Be A 'High Threat'
86 Congressional signers demand an end to the FDA’s ban on gay blood donors
Most Colorado Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce Gun Control Law
First Online Eyewear Retailer to Accept Bitcoin for Products
'The Fed Is Trying Like Crazy, But Nothing It's Doing Can Save The Economy'
A License to Commit Aggression
TSA Harasses Bitcoiner: Traveler Suspected of Carrying Bitcoin