“The international community—which includes many multi-tribal, ethnic, racial, or sectarian states—frowns on solutions that formally or implicitly break up states. Many have their own minorities that might be encouraged to break away. Thus, arguments are used that it’s a form of apartheid or that boundaries cannot be drawn exactly and will always leave some unfortunate souls on the other side of the line. In South Africa, apartheid was forced separation using armed might of a minority against a majority. In Iraq and Libya, such decentralized governance would have to be voluntary and would reflect existing ethno-sectarian or tribal areas, respectively.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4700
Related posts:
Remember Ruby Ridge
Precious Metals Power Summit 2013
Warren Buffett: How inflation swindles the equity investor [1977]
The American Empire vs. Your Retirement Prospects
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught
The Future of the Web Looks a Lot Like Bitcoin
Paul Craig Roberts: How America Was Lost
Cameron Herold: Let's raise kids to be entrepreneurs [2010]
The Market Shall Set North Korea Free
Petting & Walking With Cheetahs in Africa at Mukuni Big 5 Safaris
Crooked Judges Want Your Kids for Cash
Niall Ferguson: Networks and Hierarchies
America's Emerging Police State: A Brief History
Colorado’s New Cannabis Economy
The Neoliberal Financial Skim
