
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Privatization Is the Best Response to FAA Deliberately Inconveniencing Air Passengers
This is the Moment
Obama: A Keynesian, Not a Communist
Anthony Gregory: The Twisted Premises Implicit in the Drive for War
The Real National Security Interest of America
Putin, gold and silver: What you need to know right now
The Kafkaesque Sacrifice of Encryption Security in the Name of Security
Paul Craig Roberts: The Special Interests Won Again
Smoking Gun Memo Changes Context of Middle East
Confronting America the Torturer
Marxist Publishing House Asserts Copyright Against Free Websites
Lacking More Important Business, Trump Renews War On Pot Smokers
Bernard von NotHaus: ‘Rosa Parks’ of the Dollar
Nancy Grace Points the Way to Gold Confiscation?
Syria and the Albright Syndrome