
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Peter Schiff: US Could Be On A Gold Standard Within Two Years
Detlev Schlichter: Bubble trouble: Is there an end to endless quantitative easing?
"Tax Justice” Report Provides Renewed Justification for Offshore Crackdown
The Syria AUMF: Be Careful What You Vote For
The Bank of Japan must crush all resistance, and will do so
Bill Bonner: The Fed Chief America Deserves
Ron Paul: Congress Exploits Our Fears to Take Our Liberty
Did you miss your IRS agent today?
Cops held liable in SWAT killing of unarmed man; city blames jurors' racial bias
Language—even profanity—evolves faster than it can be regulated
Jim Rogers BBC Interview - 25 Feb 2013
Andrew Bacevich, The pretend war: why bombing Isil won't solve the problem
Do Citizens Have the Responsibility to Protect the Police?
Outrageous Julian Assange Tweet By Time Reporter Michael Grunwald
Despite panic, China’s regulation of Bitcoin leaves room for optimism