
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Never Mind the Wall—They’re Building Warehouses for Immigrant Children
The Deep State’s Christmas Present to America: Surveillance That Never Ends
‘Boston Strong’: Marching in Lockstep with the Police State
Why (was) Geithner in Germany?
Robert Mueller's forgotten surveillance crime spree
Electronic Walls, Property and Government
QE3: A Risky Ploy to Solve the Problems of Bad Fiscal Policy with Bad Monetary Policy
Killing to Save in Syria: When Liberalism is Lethal
American Paths, Chosen and Not (1989-2018)
Can Obama Control Syrian Outcomes?
Detroit's Future in the Face of Bankruptcy
Bitcoin: Objections and Replies
Bill de Blasio’s housing pipe dreams
65 years after historic bus boycott, Louisana finally bans boycotts -- of Israel
Pepe Escobar: Manning guilty; war criminals on the loose