
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Is every nation on earth besides the United States "isolationist?"
Mark Steyn Correctly Worries about Obama’s Looming Syrian Adventure
Sovereign Debt Pile-Up Spurs Wave Of Downgrades To Kick Off 2017
Does fear make Americans stupid?
Official Report of Israeli Assassinations in Iran
The Myth of Trump’s ‘Global Retreat’
No Dorothy, US Capital Controls Haven’t Been Imposed
Ron Paul: Moving Toward War in Syria
Bill Bonner: A Barbarous Fed…
Bill Bonner: This Market Is a Titanic in Search of an Iceberg
US Obsession With the Importance of the Mideast and Solving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Ben Bernanke Plots More Mayhem?
Congressional Approval Is Not The Critical Issue
Thank you for your service, Mr. Snowden
Retaining Their Freedom Is the Real Problem US Citizens Face