
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Nigel Farage: West Headed Into Orwellian Nightmare & Bankruptcy
Top Dems urging Obama to raise debt ceiling all voted against increase in ’06
Jim Rogers on Politics, Money Metals and How to Deal With an Endless Downturn
Bill Bonner: Special Independence Day Edition
Paul Craig Roberts: The Special Interests Won Again
Bruce Schneier: iPhone Fingerprint Authentication
State Department: “We cannot make India look at you as an American”
The 12 Gold Bugs of Christmas
Criminals do not need guns
Bill Bonner: Trust is falling
Will FISA secrecy doom democracy?
Nine Reasons Why Bombing Syria Is Not an Act of Justice
Bill Bonner: Stay Away from Obama’s MyRAs…
What Higher Mortgage Rates Mean in the Real World
Ron Paul: Iraq, The 'Liberation' Neocons Would Rather Forget