“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
What Everyone Is Missing About Trump’s Military Parade
Bill Bonner: The Grandest Larceny of All Time
Ron Paul: Congress Defers to President On NSA Reform
Ron Paul, The New Militarism: Who Profits?
Europe's Unraveling Is Not Political but Technological
Bush-Era Diplomatic Official Endorses Military Coup In Venezuela
Outrage at Trump is phony; US leaders have praised dictators for decades
Glenn Greenwald: Newtown kids v Yemenis and Pakistanis: what explains the disparate reactions?
Jim Rogers: At What Price You Should Start Buying Gold
Bill Bonner: Trump’s Tax Plan Would Bankrupt the Empire
Paul Craig Roberts: Lawlessness Is The New Normal
Thomas Drake: Snowden saw what I saw - surveillance criminally subverting the constitution
"Tax Justice” Report Provides Renewed Justification for Offshore Crackdown
Marxist Publishing House Asserts Copyright Against Free Websites
Doug Casey on the Fiscal Cliff