“The key political issue that is shaping up here is whether or not the world is a unipolar world politically and militarily, with the superpower U.S. being that pole. The alternative view, which is gaining strength, is that the world is a multipolar world, with many voices. The anti-bombing voices among the American public are rising, and so are voices overseas with a number of different views. The administration and some Congressmen are focused on the ‘message’ that failing to bomb conveys; they are focused on credibility. But what they are missing is that no matter how this event turns out, all the other voices have been entering the conversation.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/syrian-decision-shaping-up-as-unipolar-vs-multipolar/
(Visited 27 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The Neocon and the CIA Drug Lord
James Bovard: Budget bill leaves no boondoggle behind
Bill Bonner: Can paper money survive a full credit cycle?
California’s Economic Suicide and other News from Yesterday’s Ballot Measures
A Bad Argument for Bombing Syria
The Attack on U.S. Property Rights Continues
Paul Craig Roberts: Gangster State US/UK
Obama’s Latest Arguments Do Not Hold Water
Jacob Hornberger: From Crises Comes Leviathan
Ron Paul: When they came for the Raw Milk drinkers...
Ron Paul: Why Is Washington Backing Saudi Starvation Policy In Yemen?
Imagining a Legal Basis for Obama's Overseas Assassinations
Bill Bonner: Three Signs That Never Fail to Predict a Bear Market
An Open Letter to the FBI
Detlev Schlichter: U.S. Republicans introduce gold standard debate – mainstream media go mental