“The key political issue that is shaping up here is whether or not the world is a unipolar world politically and militarily, with the superpower U.S. being that pole. The alternative view, which is gaining strength, is that the world is a multipolar world, with many voices. The anti-bombing voices among the American public are rising, and so are voices overseas with a number of different views. The administration and some Congressmen are focused on the ‘message’ that failing to bomb conveys; they are focused on credibility. But what they are missing is that no matter how this event turns out, all the other voices have been entering the conversation.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/syrian-decision-shaping-up-as-unipolar-vs-multipolar/
Related posts:
Why I think the NSA is lying
3 Fallout Predictions from the Syrian Civil War
Pepe Escobar: The Real Currency, Gold and Energy War in Mali
Jacob Hornberger: How U.S. Sanctions Work Their Evil
Nigel Farage: Nigel Lawson calls time on the three-pint Eurosceptic heroes
Would You Vote for This Guy?
The Silent Republicans
Our Rulers’ $1.5 Billion "Backup Hard Drive"
Digital Technologies vs. Truth Suppression
Bill Bonner: Three Signs That Never Fail to Predict a Bear Market
Bill Bonner: Why Democrats are Plotting Against Obamacare
Precious Metals Power Summit 2013
Bill Bonner: Is it time to choose sides in Egypt?
Ron Paul: The Death of Daniel Somers
Retirement Myth Reveals the Possibility of Great Socioeconomic Change
