“Since Sept. 11, our government has acted as if security and privacy were an either/or proposition. In other words, an increase in one causes a decrease in the other. Like a seesaw, if one side goes up, the other side must go down. As federal security consultant Ed Giorgio stated several years ago in a widely quoted New Yorker article, ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.’ Apparently, in order to be more ‘secure,’ we must accept less ‘privacy.’ That includes allowing increased warrantless surveillance and scrutiny by the government. So is the government’s argument sound?”
http://lfb.org/today/privacy-held-hostage-by-security-public-unimpressed/
Related posts:
California Leads Nation with Sound Money — in 1865 [2010]
Whom would you HIRE to intervene in Syria?
The Final Nail in the Coffin: The Death of Freedom in Our Schools
Cage Complex: Why is America’s prison population soaring?
American Banksterism Through the Ages
The Top 6 Reasons Why Everyone Needs a Second Passport
Pot And Pregnancy: It’s Harmless, So Why Are Moms Still Prosecuted?
The Security State’s Reaction to Snowden Shows Why It’s Doomed
Wendy McElroy: First They Came For The Porn Stars...
Taxation of Americans Abroad versus the 14th Amendment
Eleven Years after 9/11, Guantánamo Is a Political Prison
On Poisoned Ground: East Chicago’s legacy of lead pollution
Detlev Schlichter: Good riddance to deposit ‘insurance’
The Blow That Killed America 100 Years Ago
Spare us the hypocrisy over chemical weapons, America.