“Since Sept. 11, our government has acted as if security and privacy were an either/or proposition. In other words, an increase in one causes a decrease in the other. Like a seesaw, if one side goes up, the other side must go down. As federal security consultant Ed Giorgio stated several years ago in a widely quoted New Yorker article, ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.’ Apparently, in order to be more ‘secure,’ we must accept less ‘privacy.’ That includes allowing increased warrantless surveillance and scrutiny by the government. So is the government’s argument sound?”
http://lfb.org/today/privacy-held-hostage-by-security-public-unimpressed/
Related posts:
An Armed People in Mexico and Their Threat to the State
Bill Bonner: Why do we have this credit-based money?
Secession: Armed vs. Peaceful
The Latter-Day Rome Lives And Kills
The hustlers and parasites who make up Washington's establishment
Will Grigg: The Death of a Slave-Catcher
Obama's rogue state tramples over every law it demands others uphold
Ten Ways to Get People to Change
American Pravda: The JFK Assassination, Part I - What Happened?
Nasser Al-Awlaki: The Drone That Killed My Grandson
The cops are a dangerous replacement for private gun ownership
Has your life been stolen from you by the IRS?
Wendy McElroy: The Competitive Provision of Security
Will Grigg: "Ominous Threats" and Murderous Zeal
Paul Craig Roberts: Why War Is Inevitable