“Since Sept. 11, our government has acted as if security and privacy were an either/or proposition. In other words, an increase in one causes a decrease in the other. Like a seesaw, if one side goes up, the other side must go down. As federal security consultant Ed Giorgio stated several years ago in a widely quoted New Yorker article, ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.’ Apparently, in order to be more ‘secure,’ we must accept less ‘privacy.’ That includes allowing increased warrantless surveillance and scrutiny by the government. So is the government’s argument sound?”
http://lfb.org/today/privacy-held-hostage-by-security-public-unimpressed/
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Former CIA Officer Philip Giraldi: 'Edward Snowden Is No Traitor'
Euro Pacific Capital Global Investor Newsletter: October 2012
Doug Casey on Second Passports
David Galland: Lessons from the Argentine
Was Keynes a Brilliant Investor?
Why U.S. Should Adopt Residency-Based Taxation
The Economic Philosopher's Outcast: Mises
Jacob Hornberger: Why Kennedy Had to Be Removed
Ron Paul: Government Policies Hurt Low-Wage Workers
The Road to Debt-Serfdom
James Corbett: The State is Not Great
An Investment that Thrives, Even in a Weak Economy
From Africa to Anadarko, a Story of Love and Markets
Paul Craig Roberts: Humanity Is Drowning In Washington’s Criminality
Koch Has No Power to Coerce Anybody; That's Why He Needs Government