“Since Sept. 11, our government has acted as if security and privacy were an either/or proposition. In other words, an increase in one causes a decrease in the other. Like a seesaw, if one side goes up, the other side must go down. As federal security consultant Ed Giorgio stated several years ago in a widely quoted New Yorker article, ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.’ Apparently, in order to be more ‘secure,’ we must accept less ‘privacy.’ That includes allowing increased warrantless surveillance and scrutiny by the government. So is the government’s argument sound?”
http://lfb.org/today/privacy-held-hostage-by-security-public-unimpressed/
Related posts:
Michael Scheuer: The price of U.S. interventionism in Syria and Israel
Are You Already in Jail?
The Trick is to Suspend the Constitution Without Admitting It
Ivan Eland: The Endless Cycle of Terrorism
Former Clinton, Cameron Advisors: 'Why Bitcoin is on the money'
Why U.S. Should Adopt Residency-Based Taxation
Are Police in America Now a Military, Occupying Force?
Janet Yellen, the Nation's New Chief Slumlord
Who Can Best Advise You?
The Wolf and the Lamb - David Galland
Walter Williams: Why Aren't Murderous Communists Condemned Like Nazis Are?
Jim Bovard: The Sordid History of IRS Political Abuse
2014: The First Year of the 21st Century Dark Age
Chris Martenson: Bankers Own the World - And are ultimately destroying it
To Lower Healthcare Costs, End The "Certificates Of Need" Racket