“Since Sept. 11, our government has acted as if security and privacy were an either/or proposition. In other words, an increase in one causes a decrease in the other. Like a seesaw, if one side goes up, the other side must go down. As federal security consultant Ed Giorgio stated several years ago in a widely quoted New Yorker article, ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.’ Apparently, in order to be more ‘secure,’ we must accept less ‘privacy.’ That includes allowing increased warrantless surveillance and scrutiny by the government. So is the government’s argument sound?”
http://lfb.org/today/privacy-held-hostage-by-security-public-unimpressed/
Related posts:
Why U.S. Should Adopt Residency-Based Taxation
Jeffrey Tucker: Let’s Talk About…The Plague
Paul Rosenberg: 'Production Versus Plunder', Part 5
Bill Bonner: American grifters
Bob Higgs: The State Is Too Dangerous To Tolerate
John Whitehead, America’s Reign of Terror: A Nation Reaps What It Sows
Bitcoin is a Startup
John Hussman: Recognizing the Risks to Financial Stability
The Blindness of Modern Economists
Bill Bonner: To the Class of 2015, Part 2
"Ferguson Effect": Increased Police Lethality, More Prosecutorial Deference
Why you need offshore gold storage
In France's Welfare State Status Quo, Are We Seeing America's Future?
Americans Are War Weary ... And The Neocons Don't Like It
What if everything you know is wrong?