“This mindset that any challenge to police authority is a threat that needs to be ‘neutralized’ is a dangerous one that is part of a greater nationwide trend that sets law enforcement officers beyond the reach of the Fourth Amendment. Equally problematic is the trend in the courts that acquits officers involved in such shootings, letting them off with barely a slap to the wrists. What exactly are we teaching these young officers in the police academy when the slightest thing, whether it be a hand in a pocket, a man running towards them, a flashlight on a keychain, or a dehumanizing stare can ignite a strong enough ‘fear for their safety’ to justify firing on an unarmed person?”
Related posts:
David Galland: Answers from a Monetary Master
Making the Victim Pay for the Bullet
Everything Created Digitally Is Nearly Free--Including Money
Abraham Lincoln and the Federal Reserve System: A Forgotten Connection
Will Grigg: Why is it a “Crime” to Disarm a Uniformed Aggressor?
Why Does Monsanto Always Win?
Manipulation of the Gold Price
Bill Bonner: Turning Argentine...
Paul Rosenberg: 'Production Versus Plunder', Part 2
An Idiot’s Guide to Bitcoin: the man behind the book
US Markets Are Running On Borrowed Money, Borrowed Time
The Devil's Chessboard: How the First CIA Director Collaborated With Nazis
Hershey, Cuba
Paul Craig Roberts: In Amerika Law No Longer Exists; the extermination of truth
The Industrial Revolution You Haven't Met
