“Although the legislation touts the 30,000 units of affordable housing that were produced during the past decade through inclusionary mandates, it ignores the fact that the mandates reduced the growth of new housing by a far-greater number. In Los Angeles and Orange counties alone we estimate that during the period we studied more than 17,000 potential new homes were never built due to the inclusionary zoning requirement, while only 770 inclusionary units were added. Politicians like inclusionary zoning because it allows them to champion affordable housing without having to directly raise taxes. But the new houses aren’t free. Someone must pay for them.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4726
Related posts:
Sending Money Home: Technology or Bureaucracy?
Jacob Hornberger: Replacing The Welfare-Warfare State With A Free Society
Stanford Seminar - BTC: Bitcoin, a New Value Chain in China
The IRS is Coming After the Little Guys
Top 10 Reasons Why the Mafia is Better than the State
Senior Italian parliament economist on Ludwig von Mises and the current economic crisis
Chris Hedges: The Treason of the Intellectuals
Money is Funny
The Decline of Political Protest
Election won't prevent pension crash
Trace Mayer on Bitcoin Investments
Decentralize to Neutralize Turmoil in Middle East
Jim Bovard: How 'Food for Peace' Hurts Foreign Farmers
The Digital Trap in your Offshore Plan
The Egyptian Debacle