“The seven studies include among them 86 findings about the effectiveness of counterterrorism programs, and those findings are startling. Lum, Kennedy and Sherley report that the average effect of the programs examined was negative. That is, the intervention was found to increase terrorist incidents rather than reduce them. The results varied by the type of intervention, but not in a way that should give us any comfort about our strategy. It’s scandalous that we spend billions every year on counterterrorism but barely spend any effort on evaluating whether what we’re doing works.”
Related posts:
Afghan villagers flee their homes as US drones terrorize them
Experts Increasingly Contemplate End Of Smoking
NYT: 'Close the N.S.A.’s Back Doors'
Europe’s Workers Flock to Norway for Better-Paying Jobs
Robert Rector: How the War on Poverty Was Lost
Healthy girl confiscated from parents who smoked pot, given to murderous foster mother
US Senate panel approves use of force against Syria
Seized shark fins dumped in Marshall Islands ceremony
Facebook Is Looking for Employees With National Security Clearances
Disabled veteran could change U.S. drug policy on medical marijuana
Bill to Restrict N.S.A. Spying Blocked By Senate Republicans
China Central Bank: No Longer in China’s Interest to Increase Reserves
ACLU: Secret program blacklists immigrants who are ‘perceived to be Muslim’
Library of Congress to archive Americans’ tweets
With Bullets Scarce, More Shooters Make Their Own