“The courts have already found that simply not answering questions post-arrest can be used as evidence of guilt. But what happens when you ask for legal representation before the police have arrested or detained you? The prosecution argued that Okatan’s request for a lawyer was itself an admission of guilt. While we all supposedly have a right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, the government (meaning law enforcement and prosecutors — both operatives of the state) have been poking and prodding at the amendments’ weak spots over the years, turning these ‘rights’ into privileges that have to be asserted loudly, unwaveringly and timed correctly. What a joke.”
Related posts:
Bank of England Vault Floor Layout
The Missiles That Brought Down TWA Flight 800
Feinstein: American Visa Waiver Program Is a Security Threat
Amazon employees protest sale of facial recognition software to police
Dealership That Sold A Tesla For Bitcoin Wants To Make More Digital Deals
Americans Used to Tar-and-Feather Tax Collectors
My journey from war to peace
Exchange Platform Safello Builds Sweden’s First Bitcoin ATM
It’s all over: Bitcoin miner maker HashFast to auction remaining assets
Krugman's "Success Story": 700,000 Strong Protest in Argentina Against Inflationist Prez
It’s time to tell the TSA what you really think of it – and for it to listen
Court Deals Blow to Anonymity and First Amendment
FinCEN: Cloud Mining, Escrow Services Aren’t Money Transmitters
Sen. Lindsey Graham: Support immigration bill since with it "we've practically militarized the borde...
U.S. Government Asks Court Not To Consider Targeted Killing Challenge