“The courts have already found that simply not answering questions post-arrest can be used as evidence of guilt. But what happens when you ask for legal representation before the police have arrested or detained you? The prosecution argued that Okatan’s request for a lawyer was itself an admission of guilt. While we all supposedly have a right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, the government (meaning law enforcement and prosecutors — both operatives of the state) have been poking and prodding at the amendments’ weak spots over the years, turning these ‘rights’ into privileges that have to be asserted loudly, unwaveringly and timed correctly. What a joke.”
Related posts:
Is Bitcoin Really Going to $1 Million?
Imagine the ‘outrage’ from environmentalists if it had been an oil derrick
Former narcotics officer: We terrorized families over a bag of pot
Glenn Greenwald: Pentagon's new massive expansion of 'cyber-security' unit is about everything excep...
WSJ: White House Preparing Bernanke's Replacement
Neo & Bee CEO Danny Brewster Faces Fraud Allegations in Cyprus
Need Cash, But Don’t Want to Lose Your Bitcoins? Pawn Them
Where Nervous Europeans Are Really Putting Their Money
#DNCLeaks 'disappears' from trending news as WikiLeaks emails released
TSA Pursues Administrative Trial Against Man Who Disrobed At Airport Checkpoint
Canada's Last Bitcoin-Friendly Bank Closes Accounts Nationwide
Media Blacks Out New Snowden Interview
Five+ Years of Fed Futility Laid Bare for All to See
Couple handcuffed for passing out End the Fed literature near Liberty Bell
Backdoor gives attackers admin access to DSL modems/routers