“The courts have already found that simply not answering questions post-arrest can be used as evidence of guilt. But what happens when you ask for legal representation before the police have arrested or detained you? The prosecution argued that Okatan’s request for a lawyer was itself an admission of guilt. While we all supposedly have a right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, the government (meaning law enforcement and prosecutors — both operatives of the state) have been poking and prodding at the amendments’ weak spots over the years, turning these ‘rights’ into privileges that have to be asserted loudly, unwaveringly and timed correctly. What a joke.”
Related posts:
Israel Airstrike on Syria: Strange Bedfellows?
Senate Votes To Turn NSA Spying Back On, But With Reforms
The head of the IMF says bitcoin is 'too expensive for me at the moment'
What Are Bitcoins: The How, Why and Why Not
New York Hedge Fund Has Already Taken $5.4m in Bitcoin Deposits
Mining Finance Drops 56% In June Quarter
Texas Supreme Court bars sentimental value suits from dog owners
California gets face scanners to spy on everyone at once
Switzerland Was Top Offshore Wealth Destination In 2012
Christian school defies Arkansas attorney general, arms teachers & posts sign
"The TSA Blues"
Homelanders propose more tax hikes on U.S. Persons abroad
Libyan official on Saudi Prince Bandar delivering Israeli chemicals to Syrian terrorists
New Jersey Just Banned Trash Talking in High School Sports
Second California county joins push to form state of ‘Jefferson’