“The courts have already found that simply not answering questions post-arrest can be used as evidence of guilt. But what happens when you ask for legal representation before the police have arrested or detained you? The prosecution argued that Okatan’s request for a lawyer was itself an admission of guilt. While we all supposedly have a right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, the government (meaning law enforcement and prosecutors — both operatives of the state) have been poking and prodding at the amendments’ weak spots over the years, turning these ‘rights’ into privileges that have to be asserted loudly, unwaveringly and timed correctly. What a joke.”
Related posts:
Reuters Makes the Rational Case for a Surveillance State
Post Office Refuses To Pay Traffic Camera Tickets
Lily Allen Sorry for Turning Down a Gig Worth a Fortune in Bitcoins
17 Signs That Most Americans Will Be Wiped Out By The Coming Economic Collapse
ICE gains access to database that tracks license plates in realtime
Farm Fresh Food with Bitcoin - La Nay Ferme help Beccy & Austin eat!
Group warns military: Prepare now for risks of ‘mutant soldier’ future
Bitcoin ATMs For Australia, The First In Melbourne
Wash. state bill allows police to search students without parental consent
Anti-Secession Threat From Spookville
Frank Lautenberg's Widow Reaps $174,000 In Senate Budget Bill
“Abolish ICE” is becoming more than just a protest cry
NWO: The Enemy of Humanity HD
China is Banking on a Detroit Comeback
Ohio police chief hospitalized after eating ‘cannabis cake’