“When the government gathers intelligence in order to prevent the future occurrence of an act of domestic terror, as opposed to when it gathers evidence in order to solve a crime that has already been committed, it believes it is not subject to the constraints of the Fourth Amendment. Such an argument is Stalinesque in its sweep, has no support in history, law or Supreme Court jurisprudence, and is a subterfuge concocted to dupe the public, the media and the judiciary into overlooking, accepting and authorizing the broadest governmental assault on constitutionally protected freedoms since the Alien and Sedition Acts.”
http://www.creators.com/opinion/judge-napolitano/spying-and-lying.html
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
(Visited 14 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Australia’s Carbon Tax: Lessons for the United States
Magna Carta, Subsistence Culture and Western Civilization's Future
Got grandparents? Four places where you can become a citizen.
Black helicopters and ‘Ride of the Valkyries’: The war on pot in California
Paul Rosenberg: The Beauty and Dignity of the Productive Class
The Fed's Asset-Inflation Machine
The Fourth Branch: The Rise to Power of the National Security State
Poor Training Of Narcotics Officers Contributes To Culture Of Ignorance
'Teen Culture', The Imperialism Of Consumerism
Paul Craig Roberts: Attack On Sovereignty
Freedom or the Slaughterhouse? The American Police State from A to Z
Why The U.S. Job Market Remains Terribly Bleak
A Colonial Gatekeeper That Hillary Would've Approved Of
Bill Bonner: How to Disappear Without a Trace
Decentralize to Neutralize Turmoil in Middle East