“While he reiterated his support for a bill that was introduced a few months ago that restricts Section 230, his renewed focus on the FISA Court may be the more interesting tidbit. This is a key point in all of this that is often missed in the debates. The FISA court was supposed to just look at warrant requests from law enforcement to make sure they make sense. But it’s changed into a body that is actually making law, by figuring out how to interpret various statutes, often in secrecy, without any opposing viewpoints presented. That’s not what it was designed to do, and it’s part of how we ended up in the situation we’re in today.”
(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
British Journalist Jailed Without Trial for Covering Child Sex Trafficking Trial
Brooklyn Bodega Owner: Why Merchants Should Start Accepting Bitcoin
Real Estate: “Millennials” Out, Chinese Buyers In
US government proposes law making it illegal for them to kill you
Brandon Raub Issues First Public Comments Since Being Arrested, Detained in Psych Ward Over Views
Atlanta Pursues Scorched Earth Policy Against Street Vendors, Loses
Majority Views NSA Phone Tracking as Acceptable Anti-terror Tactic [2013]
QE 3 Moves to Japan
Target confirms up to 40 million credit and debit cards are at risk
New Yorker Foodies Pissing Off the Regulatory Bullies
Internal Revenue Code severely punishes (other) countries which impose extraterritorial taxation
Apple purges 'last remaining' Bitcoin trading app from App Store
House votes to uphold increased spending on ‘unneeded and unwanted’ nuclear bombs
Texas Police, Looking for More Military Hardware, Tout Its Use In Harvey Relief
US Ally Turkey Attacks US-Backed Forces In Syria