“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
The True Value of Bitcoin
Is America Too Big?
Eleanor Roosevelt’s Snippy Letter to Dorothy Day [2011]
Wow much Dogecoin. Very competition. So money.
Know your rights, read the Constitution
Cyprus, The First Domino?
Grasping for Dignity in the Era of the American Police State
Anthony Wile: Sit Silently ... as Bombs Burst in Air
'Won't Get Fooled Again'
The Battle for Self-Ownership in Medical Care
Naomi Wolf: Britain’s Retreat from Free Speech
The Good News Is That the Bad News about Kansas Was Wrong
Michael Reichert and the Road Pirates of Collinsville, Illinois
Doug Casey on the Debasement of Money, Language and Banking
Gary North: How Come We're So Rich?