“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Thin Wire - Hawala
America’s Schools Transform Into Authoritarian Instruments of Compliance
A Special Relationship: The U.S. is teaming up with Al Qaeda, again
9/11 happens every day to war torn nations
The Unlikely and Remarkable You
Former IMF Chief Economist: Sadly, Too Big to Fail Is Not Over
James Corbett: The State is Not Great
I, Pencil: The Movie
James Bovard: Hey, wait a minute, Trump's fear-mongering isn't new
The Greatest Opportunity in 30 Years
The Tax-Evaders Who Never Make The News
Welcome to Post-Constitution America
Could You Be Arrested For Offering A Lyft?
Wendy McElroy: Let a Thousand Home Businesses Bloom
John Hussman: Psychological Whiplash