
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Is the National Security Agency behind Bitcoin?
A Story of Slavery in Modern America
Decentralizing Science: Local Biohacking
Pot And Pregnancy: It’s Harmless, So Why Are Moms Still Prosecuted?
Jacob Hornberger: Dealing with the Cops
“Hurry Up and Die”: The Inescapable Outcome of Socialized Medicine
America's Energy Boom and the Rising U.S. Dollar
Bob Murphy: The Myth of Wartime Prosperity
American Banksterism Through the Ages
Why Foreign Real Estate is an Internationalization Grand Slam
Americans Are on a Tight Leash
The Echo Boom in Housing-Recovery Stocks
Understand the Emergence of the Marijuana Meme - Even In China
Gupta Mea Culpa
3 Reasons the ‘Nothing to Hide’ Crowd Should Be Worried About Government Surveillance