
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Peter Schiff: The GDP Distractor
The Supreme Court’s Deference to the Pentagon
Dissolve the Federal Government
Central banks that trade on the stock market [2013]
How to Use Sex Like a Russian Spy
Ron Paul: Meaningless Words in Politics
The impulse to ban
The Creative Destruction of New York in 47 Seconds
Dimes on Black and Dynamite on Red
It's Happening Faster Than Even I Thought
Why Are Cops Acting Like Soldiers?
The Death of Privacy
The Border-Industrial Complex Goes Abroad
The “Domestic Terrorist” You Can Call a Hero
A Congregation of Liars: The U.S. Government