
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
The burgeoning underground economy
Is the Fed Blowing a New Housing Bubble?
Foreign asset reporting before FBAR and FATCA: “loyalty questionnaires” for World War II Japanese Am...
FATCA and the End of Bank Secrecy
Is America Too Big?
The Politics of Fear in America: A Nation at War with Itself
I never knew how screwed up global banking was until I started my own bank
4 Ways Living Abroad Can Give You More Freedom
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
You’re Not That Important
Detlev Schlichter: Is present monetary policy rational?
Bill Bonner: Amor Patria
The Criminology of Firearms
The Fiscal Cliff's Structural Endgame
Michael Scheuer: Pity poor America: Obama, Romney, and Foreign Policy