
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Detlev Schlichter: “Watching your money disappear” – Speech to senior representatives of the UK pens...
No More "Free Trade" Treaties: It's Time for Genuine Free Trade
The Fascinating Interventionist Mindset
The Peer-to-Peer Economy: Death Blow to the State
Naomi Wolf: The coming drone attack on America
Drawing Down: How To Roll Back Police Militarization In America
Nigeria’s Moment
Ron Paul: The Homeschooling Revolution
Psychopathic Kyriarchy – Our Rulers Really Are Unempathic Predators
The States Could Reform Obamacare If Only We Would Let Them
Philip Giraldi: Where Are They Now?
The Nearly-Free University
Gold: It’s Time to Buy
Former Clinton, Cameron Advisors: 'Why Bitcoin is on the money'
Bitcoin developer: Are bitcoin thieves revealing NSA back doors?