
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Star-Spangled Confederates: How Southern Sympathizers Decided Our National Anthem
Aye, Me Hearties—Why There’s Still Old-Fashioned Treasure Out There
Immense, Needless Human Misery Caused by Speculative Credit Bubbles
Who Are the Power Elite?
Seth Klarman On "Born Bulls", Bitcoin, & "The Truman Show" Market
The Story of Kidnapped Costa Rican Internees in One of America's World War II Concentration Camps
The Kennedy Assassination (November 22, 1963) 50 Years Later
A Lost Decade for Savers
"I'm Going to Take Him Out"
Bill Bonner: A Crash Course in Money (Part III)
Champions of Dishonesty
Doug French: So Where’s the Hyperinflation Already?
Losing Velocity: QE and the Massive Speculative Carry Trade
You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World – How to Not Get Caught
Does “Homeland Security” really protect you?