
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Ron Paul: Middle of the Road in Healthcare Leads to Socialism
Ruling Allows Officials to Seize Your House Because It’s ‘Ugly and Dumb’
Fight Back Against Hidden Regulations That Threaten Your Health
Creator of Netscape, Marc Andreessen: 'Why Bitcoin Matters'
Not Worth a Continental
Mike Gogulski: Is America still a democracy? Who cares? It’s DANGEROUS!
CITIZEN SAFETY ALERT: You Have The Right To Go Home To Your Family Too
Ivan Eland: The Endless Cycle of Terrorism
A Message to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney From a Dying Veteran
The “Chechen Connection”, Al Qaeda and the Boston Marathon Bombings
That Which Is Incapable of Reforming Itself Disappears
The Imaginary Trial of Dietrich Schmoller
How Life Finds a Way in the Regulatory State
Police Militarization: The New Search and Seizure
Incredible confusions: Why ‘austerity’ if we can just print the money?