
“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
Anthony Gregory: The Habeas Corpus Myth
The Cyprus Depositor Haircut
The Hidden History of World War I
Don't Eat These, Ever: What’s in Your Condiments?
Bill Bonner: Too Much Of A Good Thing
Pop a Slovak Cherry Into Your Mouth
What Percentage of My Assets Should I Hold in Precious Metals?
The Creative Destruction of New York in 47 Seconds
Government Against the People: It Gets Worse In the Late Stages
Investors, Run for Cover From the Incoming ‘Taper Bomb’
America’s real divide: The political class, and the rest of us
If the Law Is This Complicated, Why Shouldn’t Ignorance Be an Excuse?
Detlev Schlichter: ‘Positive Money’ and the fallacy of the need for a state money producer
FATCA, GATCA and the Changing Investment Scene, Worldwide
America's Emerging Police State: A Brief History