“Thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures, we know that the current level of general surveillance in society is incompatible with human rights. The repeated harassment and prosecution of dissidents, sources, and journalists provides confirmation. We need to reduce the level of general surveillance, but how far? Where exactly is the maximum tolerable level of surveillance, beyond which it becomes oppressive? That happens when surveillance interferes with the functioning of democracy: when whistleblowers (such as Snowden) are likely to be caught. If whistleblowers don’t dare reveal crimes and lies, we lose the last shred of effective control over our government and institutions.”
Related posts:
As Predicted, Stocks Make New Highs
Napolitano: What if Government Steals Liberty and Fails to Deliver Safety?
Crooked Judges Want Your Kids for Cash
Neocon think tank next to call out racist, pro-war roots of War on Drugs
John Hussman: How to Wind Down a $4 Trillion Balance Sheet
A Commissarina Rises: Wendy J. Olson's Reign of Terror
BEARCAT Bread And Circuses, Or Why I Ripped Up My Ticket
William N. Grigg: Reich Here, Reich Now
The Advantages of Bitcoin Over Paper Money and Gold
Agorism and Nazism: A Study in Polar Opposites
Will Warrants for Searches Become a Thing of the Past?
John Whitehead: ‘I am not a number. I am a free man!’
The Worst Inflation in My Lifetime
A Real and Lasting Peace
Central Planning by Central Bankers