
“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
Glenn Greenwald: David Frum, the Iraq war and oil
America's Energy Boom and the Rising U.S. Dollar
Trace Mayer on Bitcoin Investments
Alfred McCoy: It's About Blackmail, Not National Security
Desert Storm Anniversary Reminds Us That Even Victorious Wars Are Problematic
How to Lose a Constitution—Lessons from Roman History
Three major fault lines in Syria! Will they explode?
Wendy McElroy: Measuring the Extent of a Police State
How to Fight the Modern State
Bill Bonner: College is a con
When a government spies on its citizens: lessons from Chile
Bill Bonner: How Government ‘Works’
Dual Canadian-American citizens: We are not tax cheats
Michael Reichert and the Road Pirates of Collinsville, Illinois
The Magic of Monetary Figures