
“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
All Eyes on Europe This Summer
Gupta Mea Culpa
Our Legacy Systems: Dysfunctional, Unreformable
Murray Rothbard: Fighting for Oil? [1990]
David Galland: Big Brother's Beginnings
Bill Bonner: The Fed’s Childishly Naïve Theory of Credit
Spare us the hypocrisy over chemical weapons, America.
Bitcoin And The Two Things You Need To Know
"Ferguson Effect": Increased Police Lethality, More Prosecutorial Deference
The impulse to ban
Why Bond Market Bulls Are About to Get Crushed
Seminal Moments
“Affordable Housing” Rules Result in Opposite
Pelosi: Willing to "Protect" Syrian Children To Death
David Galland: Answers from a Monetary Master