
“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
Thai doctor: “I’m not a slave to insurance companies or regulations…”
Is the U.S. Producing Democracies?
Ron Paul: The Homeschooling Revolution
Of Coconuts, the Sun, and Small Isolated Islands
The Trick to Suppressing Revolution: Keeping Debt/Tax Serfdom Bearable
Oligarchies Masquerading as Democracies
Penning the Sheep for a Shearing—Capital Controls, Part 1
The Financial Case for Borrowing Money Today
Sticky Thoughts: The Market, Not The Government, Gave Us Super Glue
Too Big To Fail Is Now Bigger Than Ever Before
Ron Paul: The IRS and Congress Both Hold Our Liberty in Contempt
School Has Become Too Hostile to Boys
Manipulation of the Gold Price
Great Scientist ≠ Good at Math
Central Planning by Central Bankers