“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
(Visited 30 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Learn Bobby Tay’s $2.7 Trillion Sigma Secret
Debt: Destroyer of Lives, Businesses, and Countries
The Never-Ending Story of Government Cost Overruns
A $100k earner gets to keep $99k in Singapore but $57k in San Francisco
Behind the Bitcoin Surge: A Financial Futurist’s Perspective
What Percentage of My Assets Should I Hold in Precious Metals?
The worst place in the world to start a business
A congressional speech on the centennial of the Expatriation Act of 1868
Michael Hastings: A Non-Conspiracy Theory
Manipulation of the Gold Price
Not Your Father's Stock Market Anymore
Hunting for Foreign Real Estate Bargains
Oil and Water: An Armed Citizenry and a Police State
The Power Elite-Obama Connection
Profiles in Pork