“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
Paul Craig Roberts: In Amerika Law No Longer Exists; the extermination of truth
Paul Craig Roberts: The Money Changers Serenade - A New Plot Hatches
The Digital Trap in your Offshore Plan
Poor Training Of Narcotics Officers Contributes To Culture Of Ignorance
Tyler Winklevoss: Digital Darwinism
Will Grigg: The Triumph of the Reich-Publican Party
How an Online Business Can Help You Internationalize
The Century of Arbitration and Peace
BusinessWeek: The Death of Equities [1979]
Putin was wrong: The exceptionalism of the United States is alive and real
Atlanta Airport Abuses Uber and Lyft Drivers and Their Customers
Hubris Isn't the Half of It
Uber vs. the State, 1851 Edition
He Volunteered to Go to Auschwitz
Why I'm Leaving