“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
When Did the “Peace Officers” Get a “License to Kill”?
Bitcoin is a Startup
America’s Great Depression Quote of the Week: A Visit with ‘Dr. Hoover’
"Free Trade Has Destroyed American Manufacturing": False.
Citizenship, identity, mourning loss of identity and moving on …
Lawrence Reed of FEE on the Expansion of Free-Market Thinking
I Hate Government Street Sweepers
Bill Bonner: Turning Argentine...
North Korea and the United States: Will the Real Aggressor Please Stand Down?
Hayek to Satoshi and Beyond
Star-Spangled Confederates: How Southern Sympathizers Decided Our National Anthem
The Top 6 Reasons Why Everyone Needs a Second Passport
An Inflection Point for US Global Hegemony?
The Border-Industrial Complex Goes Abroad
Ron Paul: Meaningless Words in Politics