“The US Supreme Court has ruled that police may search a home without obtaining a warrant despite the objection of one occupant if that occupant has been removed from the premises. With its 6 to 3 decision in Fernandez v. California on Tuesday, the Court sided with law enforcement’s ability to conduct warrantless searches after restricting police powers with its 2006 decision on a similar case. Prior to Randolph and Fernandez, the Court ruled in the 1974 case United States v. Matlock that any one of the co-tenants in a home can consent to a police search of the premises.”
http://rt.com/usa/police-warrantless-search-permission-744/
Related posts:
'Bitcoin Will Do To Money What The Web Did To Information'
The new-found desire for privacy is what’s driving all of this new business activity.
Chicago Speed Cameras to Photograph Children?
Hannity Then and Now on NSA Surveillance
‘Beanie Babies’ creator will pay $53.5 million to IRS for $885,300 delinquency
Tennessee judge barred baby name ‘Messiah’, accused of religious bias
Corruption Is Legal In America
Here Comes The Federal Vaccination Registry System
Vermont Marijuana Decriminalization Law Goes Into Effect
Pat Buchanan: What Is America’s Mission Now?
The Revolutionary Quantum Computer That May Not Be Quantum at All
88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care
SkyCraft Airplanes Now Accepting Bitcoin Payments
Natural Gas Opportunities for MLP Investors
The Ex-Google Hacker Taking on the World’s Spy Agencies