“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
Entrepreneurs increasingly accepting 'bitcoins' in India
U.S. Customs seizes American nurse's $42,000 earmarked for Nigerian clinic
Into the Bitcoin Mines
Fmr. intelligence agent says NSA are lying, storing ALL CONTENT of calls/emails indefinitely
In Duterte's anti-drug pogrom, police and cameras tell different stories
It looks like the inside of a private jet but this is actually the inside of a humble Mercedes van
Obama promises mayors unilateral action on guns
Unemployed Spaniards rush to play slaves in Ridley Scott’s ‘Exodus’ film
CIA didn't always know who it was killing in drone strikes, classified documents show
Abuse at Ecuadorian ‘gay conversion’ drug rehabs shocks authorities
Neiman Marcus hack hit 1.1 million customers
Will Obama Bailout Crony Sugar Processors?
Dutch architect to build house with 3D printer
Police officers fired in inmate beating reinstated by administrative judge
Bitcoin and the Rise of a Digital Counterculture