
“A US Appellate Court has ruled that police must obtain a warrant before collecting cellphone location data, finding that acquiring records of what cell towers a phone connected to and when it was connected to them constitutes a Fourth Amendment search. This ruling, from the 11th Circuit, is in opposition to a ruling made nearly a year ago by a separate appellate court. In its reasoning, the court notes that while the Fourth Amendment has traditionally been applied to property rights, it’s gradually expanded to protect much more, including communications. The court cites a Supreme Court ruling that found that tracking a person using a GPS unit installed in their car requires a warrant.”
Related posts:
McCain blasts Rand Paul’s filibuster as a ‘political stunt’
5 things you need to know about what’s going on with Saudi Arabia and Qatar
JP Morgan is Taking Delivery of Silver. Why?
'Apocalypse Now' painting by Marfa artist sells for $26 million
Idaho Deputy Gets the Boot for Criticizing Megaload Ticket Blitz
Robert Ethan Saylor and the Garrity Precedent
Bitcoin and Intrinsic Value: a Layman’s Response to Alan Greenspan
Poll: Who Hates Capitalism?
Bill Kristol's Empire of Death
Build a Sandcastle, Get Fined $500, and Go to Jail For Asking To See the Law
Where the Big Players Are Buying Housing
White House Says It's Unconstitutional To Strike Down The NDAA
WordPress.com criticizes PayPal, credit card firms for restrictions, now lets you pay with Bitcoin
FOIA Documents: DHS Monitored Opposition to ‘See Something, Say Something’ Program
U.S. Home Prices at Record High, Surpasses 2006 Market Peak