“This is really an outrageous letter in that it equates legitimate differences of opinion with an attack on state policy. The implication, of course, is that ‘undermining’ is illegal. There are real costs to these promotions. People’s careers and livelihoods are affected. Not only is this sort of warmist intolerance affecting individual careers, it is also depriving groups – even whole continents – of the right to a broad energy marketplace. As in other areas, warmist tactics and intolerance increasingly polarize issues and make rational discussion difficult to pursue. When political interactions become marginalized, or even criminalized, then authoritarianism inevitably expands.”
(Visited 24 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Naomi Wolf: My creeping concern that the NSA leaker is not who he purports to be
Sanctions Will Kill Tens of Thousands of Iranians
Ron Paul: The Sequester 'Crisis' And What Should Be Done
Obama Administration Denies AP Requests For Syria Evidence
Jacob Hornberger: Political Gamesmanship at the Olympics
The Syria AUMF: Be Careful What You Vote For
Fast-Food Strike Means Time to Buy Gold
Bill Bonner: What You NEED to Know about Wealth Inequality
4 More Drones! Robot Attacks Are on Deck for Obama’s Next Term
Bill Bonner: Don’t Be Fooled By the Wealth Inequality Debate
Boots on the ground in Egypt: trading one dictator for another [2011]
The Detroit (or New American) Yard Sale … Coming to a City Near You
Why Buffett Bailed on India
Thomas Sowell: Can It Happen Here?
Glenn Greenwald: What Foreign Policy “Debate” Means on “Face the Nation”