
“Aside from the glaring demographic homogeneity — all middle-aged-or-older white people who have spent their careers in corporatized Washington establishments — there is a suffocating ideological and viewpoint homogeneity on this panel as well, particularly when it comes to foreign policy. All of the panelists, for instance, were vocal, aggressive advocates of the invasion of Iraq (as were all three GOP presidential candidates featured on this morning’s show).”
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/29/what-debate-means-on-face-the-nation/
Related posts:
Jacob Hornberger: The Banality of Evil in the War on Drugs
The Truth about Sequestration
2 of the Worst Warmongering Neocons Demand To Know
U.S. Officials Are Above the Law of Nations and Ordinary Laws
Ex-Black-Market Employee Believes Feds Only Woke A Monster
The Myth of Trump’s ‘Global Retreat’
How the Media Has Distorted a Tragedy
Paul Craig Roberts: Who Gets to Push the Nuclear Button?
A Deal With North Korea: Don’t Blow It This Time
Cyprus and the reality of banking: Deposit haircuts are both inevitable and the right thing to do
When The Window Closes For Americans
Shock: Reuters Compares Madoff Scam to Street Practices
The Fox (Monsanto) Buys the Chicken Coop (Beeologics)
The Dialectical Pomposity of the Tapering Promotion
Doug Casey on G20 Economic Suicide