
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Germany asks top US intelligence official to leave the country
If The Fed Fears An Inverted Yield Curve, Why Is It Producing One?
A Desperate US Mint Testing New Metals to Make Coins Cheaper to Mint
'Synthetic pot' cases hard to prosecute, but family businesses lose everything anyway
California’s biggest community college loses accreditation
Bitcoin could turn Canada’s cities into ‘hubs of digital currency startups’
Michael Scheuer: The Idea That They're Attacking Us Because Of Our Freedom Is Insane
Well-to-do get mortgage help from Uncle Sam
Foreign Retirement Plans Seen Scrutinized in U.S. FATCA Effort
Adam Kokesh Interviewed from Jail: "I'll Run For President To Abolish The U.S. Government"
Hungary bars foreigners from buying farmland
Bitcoins cannot be used in Russia - Prosecutor General’s Office
NPR: Lawmakers, Banking Regulators Take On Bitcoin
The disappearing allure of the safe deposit box [2014]
N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens