
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Obama administration authorizes $1.83-billion arms sale to Taiwan
Obama 'deeply concerned,' warns Russia against Ukraine intervention
United Nations tells Israel to let in nuclear inspectors
Venezuela's airport 'breathing' tax
Puerto Rico’s crisis illustrates the risks of minimum wage hikes
Over 100 Million Now Receiving Federal Welfare
Supreme Court Upholds Maryland Law, Says Police May Take DNA Samples From Arrestees
PayPal boss to discuss Bitcoin in keynote address at 2014 trade show
GOP Mogul Behind Drug Rehab 'Torture' Centers Bankrolling Opposition to Pot Legalization
And how would you like to pay, sir – cash, credit card, or Bitcoin?
Is Trump Going to Lie Our Way Into War With Iran?
3 Years in, Bitcoin Digital Money Gains Momentum
Cop who fatally shot unarmed 17-year-old boy was sworn in just 90 minutes before
UN attempts to install another central government in Somalia
Bank of England warns of a bubble as UK house prices rise 10.5%