
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
92-year-old homeowner shoots, kills intruder
Flamboyant Australian tycoon unveils plan for Titanic replica
Obama asks eurozone to keep Greece in until after election day
Germany Warns of Possible Threat to US Facilities in Spying Scandal
Pakistani Ambassador Sherry slams drones ahead of CIA talks
Glenn Greenwald's partner detained at Heathrow airport for nine hours
Police kill man, 19, after father calls to stop him from buying cigarettes
Border property owners livid after feds seize their private land
MRAPs And Bayonets: The Pentagon's 1033 Program
California’s biggest community college loses accreditation
Emboldened Rhode Island, Maine lawmakers seek to legalize pot
U.S. chooses Afghanistan for first "mother of all bombs" drop
Yang Jisheng: The man who discovered 36 million dead
Bitcoin ATM
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to America