“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
All-seeing eyes focus on the sea
Ecuador seeks to extend libel penalties to cover social media
Centuries-old disfiguring plague breaks out due to the war in Syria
Kuwait plunges into political turmoil amid crackdown
Police find $7.2 million cash stashed in suitcases at airport in Panama
House Democrat proposes police registration for neighborhood watchmen
Top ten celebrity expats living in Switzerland
Another California man fined for brown grass during water restrictions
Nick Turse Describes the Real Vietnam War
Human Rights Watch: U.S. covering up the extent of waterboarding in CIA prisons
Facebook-WhatsApp Deal Haunted by Past Web Merger Flops
Chinese woman, 64, allowed to defy one-child policy with IVF twins
U.S. police seek 'blunt impact projectile' weapons
Catholic Priest Allegedly Beheaded in Syria by Al-Qaeda-Linked Rebels Who Take Pictures and Cheer
2nd trial begins for officer accused of robbing motorists