
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Eric Holder Owes the American People an Apology
Ex-Cop Guilty of Child Abuse
State Department Employee Busted For 'Sextortion' of Young Women
Grand theft auto — by the U.S. government
Debt crisis: France puts brakes on austerity
Emerging market rout is too big for the Fed to ignore
Lawsuit settled accusing former police officer of stalking in uniform
Booz Allen Grew Rich on Government Contracts
Philly Mayor Nutter's Attempt To Tax Lap Dances Shot Down
911 Dispatcher Tells Sexual Assault Victim No Cops Will Help Her Due To Budget Cuts
Weapons made with 3-D printers could test gun-control efforts
Congress moves towards arming Syrian rebels
JPMorgan chief Jamie Dimon negotiates fine amount with U.S.
Crime Lab Scandal Leaves Mass. Legal System In Turmoil
Even when jobs return, Detroit’s workers fall short on skills