
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Critics question IRS cash-reporting initiative targeting small businesses
Who Needs Bitcoin? Venezuela Has Its 'Sucre'
Bitcoin surges 40% after US Senate hearing
Police officer gets year in jail for conning immigrants out of $13,000
Washington man arrested for online threat against Obama
French navy intercepts Syrian ship carrying 20 tons of marijuana
Pope Francis condemns ‘culture of individualism’ for economic inequality
In-Flight Thieves Targeting Airline Travelers’ Carry-On Bags
Calif. government covered up $1.9B budget shortfall for months
Italy upholds convictions of 23 CIA agents for imam kidnapping
Satellites to bring cheap, multi-gigabit Internet speeds to 3 billion people
PIMCO ex-CEO explains why his money “is mostly concentrated in cash”
Chinese Trading Suspensions Freeze $1.4 Trillion of Shares Amid Rout
The new American Idol: Should the US rule the world?
Targeted booze strikes: Aerial drone drops beer at South Africa music festival