“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Robber tries 3 police stations before turning himself in
Oklahoma prosecutors return $21,227 more to Interstate 40 travelers
Oklahoma medical marijuana petition drive underway for November
WWII Shipwreck Yields $38 Million Of Silver From Atlantic
Cyprus central bank: Bitcoin use dangerous
Anonymous Person Posts $500,000 Bond To Free Texas Teen
Cop In Florida Arrested For Giving Traffic Tickets To Minorities For No Reason
Bitcoin Comes To SWIFT
Russian researchers expose U.S. hard drive firmware spying program
Facebook Must Face Gambit Suit Over Social Game Currency
Privacy fears cause more to cover online tracks
Why Should Taxpayers Give Big Banks $83 Billion a Year?
Obamacare for some: 49% price hike since 2014, premiums of $14,300
Swiss Offshore-Adviser's Guilty Plea Marks a Shift in Tax Crackdown
Berlin Wall to host exhibit on the world’s tensest borders