
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Bitcoin gets the FBI, Homeland Security treatment
Saving the rhino with U.S. military surveillance drones
Britain should stay in European Union, says Obama administration
Cherokee County teen shot by police sniper, parents speak out
Ernst & Young: 'Bitcoin has the potential to be a game-changer'
India gives top security protection to country’s richest man Mukesh Ambani
Kerry: Snowden's actions 'despicable'
Google CEO Schmidt calls for end to private drone use
Overseas Americans: Time to Say 'Bye' to Uncle Sam?
Trump Provides Nuclear War Guarantee To Japan, Contrary To Campaign Pledge
Well Educated Young Spaniards Move Back In With Parents
Dow, S&P 500 set record highs on Bernanke, upbeat earnings
Is Bitcoin Ready for Primetime Usage?
After gun enthusiast’s arrest, rifle-toting protestors gather outside McAllen PD
Cliven Bundy will be held accountable, Interior secretary says