“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Pro-Mursi protester shot dead as Egypt standoff intensifies
Jobless Greeks Resolved to Work Clean Toilets in Sweden
Julian Assange reveals government eavesdropping messages speculating he’s being framed
Missouri senator's husband reaped $131 million in federal subsidies over 10 years
Philippines anti-drug death squads to target 9-year-old children
New York house flipping nets $40,000 average profit
U.S. says it doesn’t believe in ‘diplomatic asylum’ despite having offered it in the past
Al Franken Leaning Toward Supporting Syria Resolution
Hundreds of nonsense articles found in peer-reviewed science journals
Bernanke urges Congress to lift debt ceiling
Investigation ordered after Spanish politicians got ‘salaries’ from private companies
Purged Saudi royals must cough up 70% of their wealth to be freed
Italy’s army bringing down the cost of medical marijuana
Coroner slams handling of Kendrick Johnson case
California Family Stumped by Fired Live-In Nanny Who Won't Leave
