“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
(Visited 33 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
$11 million in bitcoins the Winklevii bought is now worth $32 million
NSA pays £100m in secret funding for GCHQ
China Now General Motors' Biggest Market
France passes 75% 'millionaire's tax'
Family of man executed in Ohio using untested procedure plans suit
Republicans want ‘dreamers’ to live under permanent suspicion
Crisis in Egypt: ‘We didn’t have space in the fridges for all the bodies’
Washington Post: U.S. $53 billion ‘Black budget’ details leaked by Snowden
Iran's Rouhani urges end to meddling in private lives
Easton bank protester will face threats charges
Obama: ‘I didn’t set a red line’ on Syria, ‘the world set a red line’
Would you download a car? Man 3D prints life-size Aston Martin DB4
Molson Coors considers marijuana legalization a ‘risk factor’
Vial of easily weaponized virus goes missing in Texas
Risky Loans Shunned by Banks Are Booming in Wall Street's Shadow