“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Simple vinegar test can prevent cervical cancer deaths
U.S. May Bomb ISIS in the Philippines
California Mileage Tax Would Charge Drivers Based on Distance Driven
U.S. births hit a 30-year low
Tina Turner claims Swiss citizenship
Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack'
Bitcoin Spawns China Virtual IPOs as U.S. Scrutiny Grows
Poll: Public doubts rise on surveillance, privacy
Spanish citizenship offer appeals to US Jews
Ecuador breaks US trade pact to thwart 'blackmail' over Snowden asylum
See which bigwig insiders are cashing in
North Korean spy’s memoir details ‘enemization’ training by abducted South Koreans
Insurance Executives Meet With Obama Staff on Fixing Health Exchange
Scientists used modified T-cells to wipe out childhood leukemia in a little girl
Swiss agree on 100-franc fines for pot smokers