“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
The Saudi Town on the Frontline of Yemen's War
Third-Largest US Futures Broker Newedge Fined for Lax Oversight of Manipulative Trades
Shipping container apartment being erected in Washington this week
Why the United States will never leave Yemen
Yemen police open fire to stop riot reaching US embassy
Millions of U.S. license plates tracked and stored – and it’s not just government agencies
Vitamins That Cost Pennies a Day Seen Delaying Dementia
With Bullets Scarce, More Shooters Make Their Own
The Members Of Romney's Campaign Who Work For Fox
Can Government Officials Have You Arrested for Speaking to Them?
Will civil war hit Afghanistan when the U.S. leaves?
Email from Michael Hastings before crash mentions FBI probe
Thousands protest in Bahrain seeking PM’s ouster
Businesses in Berlin open arms to digital currency Bitcoin
Rand Paul: 'Whatever it takes to stop' Patriot Act reauthorization
