“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Every cloud has a gold lining
Barbados Debt Higher Than Cyprus Prompts Firing of 3,000
Republicans Join Democrats in Pushing Trump to Halt Family Separations
Man Found Innocent After 20 Years in Prison, But Sent Back Anyway
Unions: Obamacare Will ‘Destroy The Very Health and Wellbeing’ of Workers
Foreign Retirement Plans Seen Scrutinized in U.S. FATCA Effort
800 U.S. police round up 129 gang suspects in Mexican Mafia raid
Millions in CIA "ghost money" paid to Afghan president's office [2013]
S&P calls US lawsuit retaliation for stripping AAA rating
Bailout Banks Made Riskier Loans: Study [2011]
World landmarks go dark for Earth Hour
German police sue American woman for slander for calling them 'Nazis'
Obama gives 83% of export loan guarantees to Boeing
Teen Faces Child Porn Charges For Tweeting Nude ‘Selfie’
Negative Yields on Eurozone Sovereign Bonds Becoming New Normal
