“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
As Egyptians Ignore Curfew, Talk of a U.S.-Brotherhood Conspiracy
Commodities: High metal prices can put lives in danger
White House dodges questions of Egyptian ‘coup’ as military aid continues
China Goes Gold Crazy. Why Now?
Pressure to legalise marijuana after Australian boy denied treatment
Sheriff Defends Deputy Who Killed Tethered Dog
Start-Ups Fill Void Left by Spain’s 26% Unemployment Rate
Russia: Hidden chips 'launch spam attacks from irons'
'Dark Wallet' wants to make Bitcoin even harder to trace
Students say they will continue protesting ‘war criminal’ David Petraeus
Yahoo Files for Alibaba Spinoff, Though Tax Issues Linger
Meet The 'Assassination Market' Creator Who's Crowdfunding Murder
Syria hails U.S.-Russia chemical weapons deal as a ‘victory’ that averts war
Obama's more than 19.5 million online fans who don't really exist
Chicago Cop Issued 200 Fake DUI Tickets To Meet Quota And Rack Up On Overtime