“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Is This the Best Time for Investors? Don't Bet On It.
New York Cops Arrest Artist Who Posted Embarrassing ‘NYPD Drone’ Posters [2012]
Interview with British ‘straight pride’ group removed by copyright takedown notice
Italian tax dodgers uncovered by the Redditometro
The Troubled Greek Bailout Process Lurches Forward
U.S. says it did not sanction holding Glenn Greenwald’s partner at Heathrow
Ex-FBI agent lands at CNN after blaming his departure on 'relentless attacks'
Race to Mine Bitcoin Gathers Steam
Councilmember who opposed asset forfeiture sees his store raided twice
Ecuador Offers to Buy Back Its Defaulted Bonds -- With a 50% Haircut
Lebanese banks tightening regulations in line with U.S. laws
U.S. diplomat warns of global effort to curb Internet freedom
Greenpeace activists break into French nuclear power plant
Protesters banned from tax title auction; 1 man arrested for using video camera
At last, a law to stop almost anyone from doing almost anything
