“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Blackstone to Buy Louisiana Shale Assets for $1.2 Billion
Judge halts Indiana city's code-enforcement property seizure racket
Mitt Romney may have breached ethics laws through company linked to Paul Ryan's brother
Hungary receives 422,000 applications under new citizenship-by-descent program
WikiLeaks Bypasses Financial Blockade With Bitcoin
EU plan to cut credit and debit card fees is confirmed
Houston police chief suspended for one day for hitting pedestrian
Kwame Kilpatrick guilty: For destitute Detroit, downfall of ex-mayor complete
Saudi princess snaps up luxurious Geneva estate for $62 million
Mongolia looks for second chance with foreign investors
ZenoRadio, a Poor Man's Pandora, Is Booming
The daughter of Cuba’s vice president defects
Texas teacher assigns 4th graders to draw suicides, explosions on 9/11
Blackstone Selling 1,300 Atlanta Houses in Strategy Shift
If The Fed Fears An Inverted Yield Curve, Why Is It Producing One?