“We can’t just make the case for capitalism based on the fact, as indisputable as it is, that capitalism produces more stuff. Even if you convince someone of that, they are vulnerable to the first charlatan who comes along and says it’s not fair, that if we only empower politicians and bureaucracies we can improve things. The case for liberty must ultimately rest upon a deep and abiding moral dimension. It’s right because it’s what humans were made for. We’re not a fleet of homogenous robots that function best when somebody programs us. We’re at our best when we’re free to be ourselves, to be responsible for our decisions without the power to impose our mistakes at gunpoint.”
Related posts:
Detlev Schlichter: Some personal thoughts on surviving the monetary meltdown
Bitcoin is a money platform with many APIs
The Suicide of Communism: The Case for Patience
Disarm the police, not the citizens
Mike Gogulski: Is America still a democracy? Who cares? It’s DANGEROUS!
Sutton’s Theory of Elite Action, Applied To ISIS
Reflections on 9/11 and the High Cost of Waging War in the Middle East
How Police Became a Standing Army
Why you need offshore gold storage
BusinessWeek: The Death of Equities [1979]
Obama Wins A Second Term: Now What?
The Man Who Was Treated for $17,000 Less
Bob Murphy: The Myth of Wartime Prosperity
Lessons from Economic Crises in Argentina
Bill Bonner: There Is No Security in Bonds Right Now