
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
OECD seeks inspiration from FATCA model
Globetrotting St. Louis pot entrepreneur sentenced to 15 years in prison
Billionaire Soros Cuts U.S. Stocks by 37%, Buys Gold Miner Barrick
Armed EPA raid in Alaska sheds light on 70 fed agencies with armed divisions
Spain suspends Catalan parliament, threatens 'greater harm'
Welcome to the 'Glock Block': Oregonians are no longer calling the police, arm themselves instead
India July silver imports highest in 5 years
Bumper Stickers Could Land Michigan Drivers In Jail
BMW takes ‘great leap forward’ into electric car market
The Southern Poverty Law Center Scam
American Character Is at Stake
Woman Wants Possessions Back After Bank Repossessed Wrong House
Is There Hope for Recent College Grads?
Nebraska school district wants deaf child to change how he signs his name
Is Government Really The Price Of Civilization?