“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
As haze clears, are American opinions on marijuana reaching tipping point?
Genetically engineered virus kills cancer
Musharraf says blasphemy law cannot be changed (2011)
Drones not just for foreign attacks, will fill up the U.S. skies
S&P sees deepening house slump in Spain, France and Holland
Venezuela's poor sour on Maduro as prices, shortages sting
Relaxed One-child Policy Intensifies China Midwife Shortage
China trying new form of ‘Internet censorship’ ahead of Tiananmen Square crackdown anniversary
Betray Your Bank Before Your Bank Betrays You
Majority of Dutch also want referendum on EU membership
Whirlpool profits strangled by the tariffs it once supported
Police 'assessing credibility' of claim Princess Diana murdered by British soldier
Global mercury ban would not affect vaccines with thimerosal
Grand theft auto — by the U.S. government
China Central Bank Warns Banks on Liquidity