
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
New Barbados currency 'more secure' [May 2013]
California governor signs bill legalizing Bitcoin, other digital currencies
Lessons from the drug raid that burned a Georgia toddler
European Car Sales Fall to 20-Year Low Amid Unemployment
UK Government and Isle of Man in deal to stop offshore tax evasion
Janet Napolitano diverts $5 million to illegal immigrant college aid
Amazon urged not to sell facial recognition tool to police
Chesapeake Energy drops legal fight over natural gas leases in New York state
Donald Trump gets into crowdfunding
Collection of phone records stirs debate: Valuable tool or 'beyond Orwellian'?
Senate-crafted Syria resolution riddled with loopholes for Obama
Indian gold imports set to resume after 4-week halt as export rule clarified
Obama, Republicans gear up for bruising U.S. budget fight
US secretly sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran
Puerto Rico Budget Won’t Include Borrowing, Official Says