“TISA also includes a prohibition on laws that require service providers to host data locally, which some countries have used to protect sensitive personal information, such as health data, from being snooped upon on foreign soil. There are arguments for and against such laws, and it is inappropriate that a secretive international agreement such as TISA should preempt these important debates. The agreement would also require countries to introduce anti-spam laws. Although spam is bad, that doesn’t necessarily make anti-spam laws good. In practice such laws have generally been ineffective at best, and ripe for abuse at worst.”
Related posts:
Texas, Oklahoma Outlaw Voter-Approved Local Fracking Bans
Unitarian Church, Gun Groups Join EFF to Sue NSA Over Illegal Surveillance
Support Your Local Slave-Catchers
US Foreign Wealth Confiscation Begins: FinCen, FATCA and FBAR
How Far Behind Detroit Are the Finance Troubles of Chicago, Los Angeles and Baltimore?
Jacob Applebaum: To Protect And Infect, Part 2
Rancher sues Feds for sneaking a spy camera on to his land
Antigua set to bypass US copyright law with WTO green-lit media, software sales website
Someone built a meth lab inside a federal research facility, and it exploded
How Our Right To Travel Became a Bureaucratic Ordeal
Where to Be Born in 2013
Report: Obama Spends $180K Per Day Undermining State Medical Marijuana Laws
Lavabit Founder Ladar Levison, The Rosa Parks of Internet Freedom
Artificial Leaf Generates 100 Watts of Power from Dirty Water
Texas Town Charging Reporters $79,000 for Emails About Cop Abuse
