“These forfeitures and the partnerships between municipal police and federal agencies rose as the economy of California slid into a slump. Forfeitures through the federal Equitable Sharing Program have tripled while forfeitures using the state’s process have remained flat (and much lower). The reason is pretty simple: California’s asset forfeiture law allows law enforcement agencies to keep only a maximum of 65 percent of the money they seize. The federal program allows law enforcement agencies to keep 80 percent. Some cities appear to be anticipating forfeiture revenue in advance and using forfeited funds to supplant budgeted spending for law enforcement agencies.”
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/21/tiny-california-towns-have-big-asset-for
(Visited 28 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Security researchers announce “first practical” SHA-1 collision attack
FEMA Camp Bill Is Resurrected
Federal Government Rating Hits New Low Among Americans
China’s Shadow Currency Addiction: ‘The Mother of All Bubbles’
Plan To Defund NSA Phone Collection Program Defeated
UK hospital meltdown after ransomware worm uses NSA vuln to raid IT
Ohio Supreme Court Takes Up Photo Enforcement Kangaroo Courts
Internment Camps: U. S. Government Field Manual
How To Stop Your Smart TV From Spying on You
Senate Votes Against Fourth Amendment Protection Act
Farming Experts Predict Food Safety Laws Will Destroy Local Foods Trend
Our Immigration System Is Leaving Iraqi and Afghan Translators to Die
Reality Check: President Obama’s Rules For Assassinating U.S. Citizens?
Woman accuses NYPD of handcuffing 7-year-old son for 10 hours
Defensive Interposition against Police Aggression