
“It’s worth stepping back to think through the logic embraced by Los Angeles, the LAPD, a district court, a Ninth Circuit dissent, and now, four dissenting Supreme Court justices. All seem comfortable with something that wasn’t addressed directly: the notion that hotel and motel guests have no right to privacy in information that they voluntarily turn over to third parties, per Smith v. Maryland. The third-party information precedent is problematic on its own. But it is devastating to privacy when paired with laws that compel businesses to collect detailed information on customers and to turn it over to police without warrants, destroying the ability to enter voluntary transactions that include discretion.”
Related posts:
Hong Kong Brokers Drive Cabs as Competition Forces Locals Out [2013]
Obamacare for some: 49% price hike since 2014, premiums of $14,300
Oklahoma changes lethal injection drugs due to seller withholdings
Portugal warns EU-IMF troika to back off on austerity demands
The Ghosts of Baha Mar: How a $3.5 Billion Paradise Went Bust
The Ron Paul Channel: libertarianism 'unfiltered and uninterrupted'
Putin questions why Western powers support Syrian rebels who ‘eat human organs’
Ecuador Central Bank President Resigns After Admitting Fake Degree
Apple says never worked with NSA on iPhone hacks
Rand Paul: 'I can't see sending my son to fight on the same side as al Qaeda'
Putin says Snowden should stop harming 'our American partners'
McCain says he feels ‘lonely’ on Syria stance
Rep. Peter King: US could make preemptive strike on North Korea
Italy risks political crisis as MPS bank scandal turns 'explosive'
6 worst home fixes for the money