
“It’s worth stepping back to think through the logic embraced by Los Angeles, the LAPD, a district court, a Ninth Circuit dissent, and now, four dissenting Supreme Court justices. All seem comfortable with something that wasn’t addressed directly: the notion that hotel and motel guests have no right to privacy in information that they voluntarily turn over to third parties, per Smith v. Maryland. The third-party information precedent is problematic on its own. But it is devastating to privacy when paired with laws that compel businesses to collect detailed information on customers and to turn it over to police without warrants, destroying the ability to enter voluntary transactions that include discretion.”
Related posts:
Egyptian army detains ousted president Mohamed Morsi, rounds up Brotherhood leaders
How rumor sparked panic and three-day bank run in Chinese city
U.S. officials arrest Swiss banker on vacation
Diabetic Cleburne Teen Hit With Taser After Crash
Icelanders Protest in Their Thousands as Parliament Sealed Off
Obama Secret Syria Order Authorizes Support For Rebels
Retired cop shoots man dead in movie theater over texting argument
Treasury Department: Legally-married same sex couples qualify to file joint taxes
Spanish unemployment tops 25 percent
Swiss Cryptocurrency Trader Will Store Your Bitcoin In A Nuclear Bunker
CNN: What is Bitcoin?
Rapper 2 Chainz arrested following a nine-hour tour bus standoff
San Francisco arrests under review after officers' slur-filled texts revealed
A Day in the Life of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss
Miami police officers caught on camera allegedly ignoring 911 calls, report says