“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
Related posts:
NYC Mayor Bloomberg spending millions on political ads as ‘counterweight’ to NRA
Colorado, Oregon, Washington or … Uruguay, who will be first?
FBI Releases Information on Michael Hastings
5 Facts Not To Bring Up At Your Local Occupy
Life Takes Visa—Except If You Want to Buy Pot
China's Smaller Cities Are Home to Growing Middle Class
Why the Only Real Way to Buy Bitcoins Is on the Streets
Warrantless Window-Smashing Weapon Search At U.S. Border Patrol Internal Checkpoint
The Virtual Interview: Edward Snowden
Homeland Security suffers data leak on 240,000 employees
Leave “My Cash” Alone, Says Oklahoma Sheriff
Don’t Fly During Ramadan
NSA routinely tapped in-flight Internet, intercepted exported routers
The Persecution of Rita Hutchens
U.S. was ‘hair’s breadth’ from detonating nuclear bomb over North Carolina