“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
(Visited 21 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Who Really Whacked Tony Soprano
eBay UK to Allow Sale of Virtual Currency from 10th February
SWAT Cop: American Neighborhoods Are 'Battlefields'
BitShares P2P trading platform to offer dividends on bitcoins
CEO of World's Biggest Bond Fund: Government Has Rigged the Game Against Investors
Missouri woman faces jail for recycling tires into flower planters
Musty Idea: War To Maintain "Credibility" As A Global Hegemon
Tyranny is Infinitely More Obscene than Naughty Words
Veteran’s Guns Confiscated After Forced ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’
Berkeley’s new soda tax panel begins allocating seized funds
US Warns India Not to Buy Russian Weapons
Lawyers: Illegal body cavity searches of women standard policy at Texas traffic stops
How U.S. Foreign Intervention Created Our Domestic Surveillance State
Gel used for buttocks enhancements blamed for 15 deaths in Venezuela
Hawaii's Forgotten Internment Camps