
“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
Related posts:
Tony Gallippi Talks Newest BitPay Innovation: Copay
Caging Children, Separating Families: The War on Immigration Has Gone Too Far
Why We're Not Sneering at the Averages
FBI Whistleblower Reveals Shocking Spy Secrets: Coleen Rowley
Reality Check: Elmwood Place Speed Cameras An example Of “Policing For Profit”?
CNN's Wolf Blitzer Thinks Yemeni Child Deaths Are Worth It
GMO-Fed Hamsters Become Infertile, Have Stunted Growth
Now China ... Reasons for Printing Money Abound
The Creepy New Security Credit Score for Spotting "Insider Threats"
Private Prisons Currently Exempt from Freedom of Information Act
‘Anti-Gravity’ 3D Printer Uses Strands to Sculpt Shapes on Any Surface
Student Expelled After Investigation By Cop Who Was Dating His Girlfriend
Minnesota City Settles After Cop Uses Mace On Deaf Motorist
Air Force sexual assault prevention officer arrested for fondling woman
More than 200 manatees killed in Florida by ‘red tide’ algae