
“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
Related posts:
Detained Man Burned Alive After Being Left Unattended In Police Car for 15 Minutes
Mortgage Rates Are at Their Highest Levels in Two Years
The NSA's Secret Cops, Known as "Q Group," are Hunting Down Edward Snowden
FBI proves seizing bitcoins isn’t the same as owning them
Grandmother in violent SWAT raid for neighbor's wireless internet use
Exonerated Chicago man claims police tortured him into confession
UK police test 'faster-than-ever' facial recognition software
Chechnya: “We Will Make You Feel What We Feel”
Eric Holder: Some Banks Are So Large That It Is Difficult For Us To Prosecute Them
Thought The Euro Crisis Was Over? These 18 Charts Show The Real Crisis That Lies Ahead
Bitcoin activists propose hard fork to keep it anonymous and regulation-free
Kris Henriksen, Founder & CEO - BIPS
HP is shipping audio drivers with a built-in keylogger
No More Communism! North Korea Capitulates: Farming.
White House confirms NASA plan to ‘lasso’ and bring asteroid near Earth