“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
Related posts:
Founder of Ultra-Arcade Cabinet Company Gets Two-Year Prison Term
NSA Sent Undercover Agents to Spy on 'World of Warcraft'
Robohand: How cheap 3D printers built a replacement hand for a five-year old boy
IRS Buying Spying Equipment: Covert Cameras in Coffee Trays, Plants
Global Markets Hitting All-Time Highs
First Amendment lawyer: ‘It is a terrible time to be a journalist’
89-year-old German grandmother gets 2 years in prison for Auschwitz comments
Driver’s License Renewal Gets Complicated
How Hackers Use Bots to Score Prime Restaurant Reservations
EU Moves to Monitor Uploads, ‘Censor’ Memes, ‘Tax’ Website Links
Fake it Till You Make it, How to Become a Journalist
Former Michigan assistant AG ordered to pay $4.5 million to gay student he stalked, defamed
The CFR: The Go-To Organization for Government Tools Ready to Cash In
Not a US person? Prove it!
Police Imposing Death Sentence Without Trial