
“The Supreme Court took up a case Monday concerning whether the government can deny criminal defendants untainted money they need to hire an attorney of their choice. In petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the case, legal experts argued that the justices should consider whether Luis’ Sixth Amendment right to hire counsel of her choice should outweigh prosecutorial efforts to recover the full value of the alleged fraud. Last year, the court’s justices ruled that indicted defendants do not have a right to challenge the forfeiture of their assets at a hearing in order to hire attorneys to defend them.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/supreme-court-asset-forfeiture_n_7534946.html
Related posts:
NDAA Lawsuit Brief Filed By Children Of Japanese-Americans Interned During World War II
Capital Punishment for Traffic Violations
U.S. Special Forces Are Sent to Tackle Global Threats
Small Utah ISP firm stands up to ‘surveillance state’ as corporations cower
7 Ways States Are Defying the Federal Government With Local Laws
'Bitcoin steals power from both banks and gangsters'
Bitcoin billboards preach to the masses in San Francisco Bay Area
China banned the letter N after people used it to attack president's plan to rule forever
Microsoft DMCA Notice ‘Mistakenly’ Targets BBC, Techcrunch, Wikipedia and U.S. Govt
Federal Judge Eviscerates Albuquerque's 'Asset Forfeiture' Racket
India hikes import tax on gold by 50%
Coinbase's Fred Ehrsam says you're thinking about Bitcoin all wrong
10 Small or remote places that have embraced Bitcoin
War On Cash promoters unfazed by India chaos and even contrary data
Government Interference in the Bowling Shoe Sector