
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
New Measures Impose Interviews On Travelers Returning To The US
Before Sir John Marks Templeton, there was Cleveland Ferguson
Obama ordered to divulge legal basis for killing Americans with drones
Illegal gold mining costs Uganda millions in lost revenue
Mandatory Meningitis Vaccine Bill Author Caught Taking $420k From Big Pharma
Kokesh Charged With Openly Carrying Shotgun in D.C.
Cop Fractures Woman’s Face, Says “I’m Going to Push Your Nose Through Your Brain”
Five Ways To Play Gold and Silver: Part I
NSA Gets Honest About Its Lack of Honesty
FBI withdraws NSL after Microsoft challenge; takes data directly instead
Will the Internet Complicate the Evolution of the Marijuana Industry?
Have gold miners missed the hedging boat?
Missouri senate votes to stop issuing driver’s licenses after concealed carry records leak
Bitcoin rapidly approaching $500 price tag, $5 billion market cap
itBit Launches Bitcoin Exchange with $5.5M in Funding