“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
Kansas City, Missouri Makes Red Light Running a Parking Violation
Social Security Administration To Purchase 174 Thousand Rounds Of Hollow Point Bullets
Fact checking NSA’s 9/11 claim: U.S. already knew identity of Saudi hijacker
Housing’s Mini-Bubble Has Popped.
NSA Taps Directly Into Undersea Fiber-optic Data Cables
Bitcoin ATM Machines Receive Full Funding Hours After Campaign Launches
Landmark lawsuit filed against the EPA for immoral human experimentation
An American Energy Revolution
Swiss Gold Initiative's Paypal Donation Account Frozen
Russia To West: We Told You Not To Overthrow Qaddafi!
30,000 people can access Ohio driver’s license database with no oversight
New product shuts car engines off with a radio pulse
Europe Continues to Circle the Drain
The Forgotten Country Where Profits Beckon
FDA urged to approve aspartame as hidden additive in milk products