
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
What's the Deal with Bitcoins Anyway?
IMF Discusses A Super Tax Of 10% On All Savings In Eurozone
Inhofe seeks hearings addressing the EPA's monstrous "illegal human experiments"
U.S. Border Patrol Guns Down Fleeing Marijuana Smuggler
Michigan House Unanimously Passes NDAA Nullification Bill
Korea: Peace Breaks Out, Despite McMaster
The Next, Great Investment Wave is Happening Here
Human rights advocates raise concerns over increased police Taser use
A Congressman who Doesn't Cotton to the Constitution
Federal Auditors, IRS Pan Tax Regulations For Bitcoins
The Crack-Up of the Eurozone Detailed in One Chart
Gold and Silver Coins in Arizona May Become Legal Tender
Adam Kokesh Charged With Felony Assault On An Officer, Held Without Bail
Huge jump in number of “published expatriates” in Federal Register
Obama Nat'l Security Adviser Admits U.S. Armed Jihadists In Syria