“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
(Visited 50 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The Resident: Why Gov't Consolidates Media
South African far-left party leader assures white people he won’t kill them - yet
"Polish" Death Camps and Censorship's Unintended Consequences
How to Protect Yourself From the Next MF Global
New Poll: 57 Percent of Americans Think Obama's Assassination Program Is Unconstitutional
Bureaucrat Who Concocted Annoying Password Rules Now Regrets It
50 unmarked graves found on segregated reform school campus in Florida
Senate Votes To Ban The Libertarian Party From Ohio Election
Google confirms critical Android crypto flaw used in $5,700 Bitcoin heist
3-D Print Your Own Invisibility Cloak, And More!
Feds confiscate investigative reporter’s confidential files during raid
What’s the Difference Between Romneycare and Obamacare?
Bitcoin Bootcamp - Hakim Mamoni
Pixar will make its 3D rendering software free for download
US Supreme Court Expands Use of Drug Dogs During Traffic Stops