
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
New Decentralized Crowdfunding Platform Could Reshape P2P Finance
151 million records, 42 targets: US Intelligence “transparency report”
Switzerland reported just 20 cases of Internet wiretapping in 2012
IRS Targets Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty
Reality Check: What is QE3? And What It Means For The U.S. Economy
Youth Without Hope: 60% Unemployment
Charlotte's Web and Zaki's Journey
After being hacked again, IRS shuts down e-File PIN service
Dogecoins and Its IBM Developer Ride Meme to $130M+ Fortune
Bitcoin & Sneaks Law with Jeffrey Paul
Pentagon plans to fight ‘War on Terror’ for another 20 years
Analysts: Muni-Bond Selloff Looks Like Lehman All Over Again
How Important Is The Spot Price of Uranium?
Fed Officials Recognized Upcoming 2007 Crisis But Weren't Worried
Iowa: Proposed Citizen Initiative Would Ban Traffic Ticket Drones