
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
Bond Losses at Federal Reserve Top $192 Billion In 3 Months
President Obama, Don't Strike Syria, Especially Without Congressional Approval
California wants to ban campfires at the beach
Open Carry Chicks Hassled by Power Hungry Cop & AR-15
Arizona cop arrested for pointing gun at store clerk while drunk
Austerity's End Could Bring Additional German Turmoil
Ben Swann Reality Check: Growing National Divide Over Guns and Gun Control
Egyptians Celebrate In Streets, Use Laser Pointers Against Police
Pixar inspires graphic comment on NSA surveillance
Sheriff Arpaio Will Arm Deputies With Automatic Weapons To Prevent ‘Illegals’ From Escaping
Surprise, Surprise Again
France Doubles Down On Cash Ban: No Transactions Over 1,000 Euros
Ron Paul on the Lew Rockwell Show 2/27/13: The New Ron Paul Era
Desktop Sized Atom Smasher Demonstrated
Pennsylvanians Coerced To Give Cheek Swabs at 'Voluntary' Checkpoint