
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
Do-Nothing Congress? Americans Think Congress Passes Too Many Laws
White House Defends Ripping Children From Parents as “Very Biblical”
eBay UK to Allow Sale of Virtual Currency from 10th February
Second New York cop confirms illegal arrest and ticket ‘quota’ system
Let us count the ways: How the feds (legally, technically) get our data
Tokyo Court: Bitcoin Not Subject to Ownership
Cash is King
Android nears 80 percent market share as iOS plummets
Blind juggling robot keeps balls in the air for hours
The Fed's Balance At The End Of 2013: $4 Trillion
Another woman arrested for defending herself against the TSA
How Obama murdered the gun culture
Bloomberg Article Describes the Death of Digital Privacy: Snowden’s Revenge
DEA Agents Sold Opioids, Stole Cash, and Falsely Identified Drug Suspects
For Smoking Marijuana, the Government Ruined This Man’s Family Forever