
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
Democratic senator votes against CIA nominee: Too many Bush-era policies continue
U.S. Admits No Imminent Threat from Syria, No Clear Evidence
Bitcoin’s Sixth Year Likely Driven By Institutional Participation
Confidential Wikileaks Cable (US Embassy in Nicosia) on Russian Money in Cyprus
Online Retail Giant Newegg Now Accepts Bitcoin
Patent Troll with Patent on Podcasting Threatens to Shut Down—or Shake Down—Podcasters
The European Central Bank on Bitcoins
Lord Obama on Shared Sacrifice
Trump Has Killed More Civilians in 9 Months Than Obama Did in 8 Years
The French National Sport Is Taxation, not Soccer
The Top 5 Bitcoin Shops
Female soldier gets jail time for fleeing to Canada
Joerg Sprave’s straight-up lethal toilet brush sniper rifle
Pirate Party Prompts Successful Campaign Finance Ruling for Bitcoin
Former Obama Intel Chief: Pentagon, Not CIA Should Control Drone Strikes