
“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
COMEX Depository Warehouse Gold Stockpile 2003-Present
Only in NH: How to Ferment a Nano-Brewvolution
New Hampshire General Assembly Approves Marijuana Legalization
Can bitcoin absorb hundreds of millions in institutional capital?
Mark Thornton exclusive RT TV interview on Bitcoin
Netherlands Bar Accepts Bitcoins For Beer With New POS System
House Staffer Tells Me What AIPAC Is Doing
India's Worst Economic Crisis Since 1991 When It Had To Airlift 67 Tons Of Its Gold
36-Year Old Hacker Who Made ATMs Spit Out Cash Dies in San Francisco; Hastings Connection?
It’s time to talk about the role of police in our public schools
Trezor to Ship Physical Bitcoin Wallets in January
The Benefits of Bitcoin in International Travel
Southern California Cities Further Reject Red Light Cameras
Hacked: yup, even your skateboard isn't safe
Florida Official: “Abandon Jesus if You Want to Feed the Poor.”