“Because they merely obtained business records from a third party, the court says that the police didn’t invade Davis’s privacy. Because there wasn’t a ‘search,’ the Fourth Amendment didn’t even apply. Despite the court’s logic, something about this case still makes many observers feel uneasy. Even AT&T filed a brief in the case, arguing that the government’s actions were illegal. We all turn over huge amounts of information to third parties every day, and almost all of our activities can be tracked through our ‘smart’ devices. And as the amount of data that businesses collect on us grows, so do concerns over the government’s ability to access that data.”
http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-spy-in-your-pocket
Related posts:
Lancaster Cops Harass Same Citizen Who Recorded Them Last Week
Obama Seeks to Reshape Neighborhoods With Housing “Diversity”
Geithner Phone Pal Revealed: Larry Fink
Bitcoin trading illegal in Iceland according to Icelandic Central bank
The Real Story Behind the 1914 Christmas Truce in World War I
Nigel Farage destroys Barroso's State of the Union
Prison Phone Call Industry Will Fight New FCC Rules Lowering Inmate Rates
Bike Lanes by Casey Neistat [2011]
Feds get in on 3D-printed firearm game
nio Card Adds Bitcoin Payments to its Long List of Features
How Does the Average Investor Buy a Bitcoin?
Thousands Of Firms Trade Confidential Data With The US Government In Exchange For Classified Intelli...
New IRS rule could cut into restaurant workers’ tips
When Terrorism Comes Home
Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne Discusses $1 Million Bitcoin Sales