
“This is in some respects the worst position Paul could take. He acknowledges that attacking Iran won’t actually prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon if that is what their government is intent on doing, but he still backs military action for the sake of ‘prevention.’ More to the point, Paul is endorsing preventive–and therefore unnecessary–war as an acceptable and appropriate policy. If there are still any Paul supporters that have been trying to find a silver lining in the senator’s increasingly hawkish foreign policy positions, this should be enough to persuade them to stop trying.”
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/paul-endorses-military-action-against-iran/
Related posts:
Canada to tax Bitcoin transactions
Wesley Clark 7 Countries in 5 Years Visualized
CDC: Painkillers Kill Four Times More than Cocaine and Heroin Combined
Senator Asks if FBI Can Get iPhone 5S Fingerprint Data via Patriot Act
Stop Ray Kelly from leading Homeland Security Department
NY Cop Convicted of Making Child Porn Given $56K & Allowed to Retire
Man on Ecstasy parties in his underwear for hours on Angela Merkel’s empty jet
Why Crude’s at Home in Triple Digits
NJ Cops Sexually Assault Innocent Man In Broad Daylight After 'Smelling Weed'
3D-printed gun maker to launch Bitcoin wallet next
Jim Grant Exposes "The Bureau Of Money Materialization" And A Submerging America
China's gold imports still at unprecedented highs
Now EU Seeks to Ban the Family
Banker Groups Sue Treasury, IRS Over Account Reporting Rule or (DATCA)
How Bitcoin Is Blossoming in Germany