
“This is in some respects the worst position Paul could take. He acknowledges that attacking Iran won’t actually prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon if that is what their government is intent on doing, but he still backs military action for the sake of ‘prevention.’ More to the point, Paul is endorsing preventive–and therefore unnecessary–war as an acceptable and appropriate policy. If there are still any Paul supporters that have been trying to find a silver lining in the senator’s increasingly hawkish foreign policy positions, this should be enough to persuade them to stop trying.”
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/paul-endorses-military-action-against-iran/
Related posts:
French Senate Holds Hearings on Bitcoin
Where Li “Superman” Ka-Shing is Investing Right Now
16 Years: The Shocking Cost and Waste of America's Endless Wars
California Congresswoman Introduces ‘Medical Marijuana Property Rights Protection Act’
Entertainment Company Wayi to Become Taiwan’s First Bitcoin Exchange
Latin American Exec: Employees Could Earn 5% More with Bitcoin
What's cooking in WHO powwow?
Argentina’s grand plan to recover US dollars is about as worthless as its own currency
What the FISA Memo Reveals about the FBI, DNC, GOP–and the sketchy timeline
Third largest cryptocurrency PPCoin moves into spotlight
IRS Targeted Organizations Named With the Words "Tea Party" Or "Patriot"
This Group May Stop the NSA From Tapping the Internet’s Backbone
Not a US person? Prove it!
Christian & gun owner in the crosshairs for radio call-in
Banned From the US? There's a Robot for That