
“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
Related posts:
U.S. Ready to Offer Mercenaries $10 Billion for a Drug-War Air Force
Government to Dispose of Radioactive Waste By Putting It In Our Silverware
Gmail app developers have been reading your emails
New England Marijuana Legalization Bills Coming
10 Chemical Weapons Attacks Washington Doesn't Want You to Talk About
New law will ban protesters from riding mass transit in California
Incoming CIA Director John Brennan refuses to say whether waterboarding is torture
Understanding Bitcoin Security - Trace Mayer interviewed by VisionVictory
Bitcoin Supporter Pepper Sprayed in the Face During Berkeley Protests
Developer warns: Take Twitter “write access” at your own risk
UK Royal Mint Working On Plans To Issue Gold-Backed Physical Bitcoins
Crypto-currency for NSA leaker: Snowden fund accepts Bitcoin
French Senate Holds Hearings on Bitcoin
Collectivists Posing As “Anarchists” Demand $3 Billion From Google
UN Claims Uruguay Not Allowed to End Marijuana Prohibition