“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
(Visited 14 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Police Groups Furiously Protest Eric Holder's Marijuana Policy Announcement
Florida sheriff taunts drug dealers in video resembling ISIS propaganda
Hopeless Savers: 0.26% on Money Markets
The U.S. Military Says It Killed About 500 Civilians Last Year; Outside Counts Far Higher
China's Record Yield Curve Inversion "Spells Disaster"
Startup Cities To Become Reality
500Mbps Internet over phone lines might solve fiber’s “last mile” problem
Historic NDAA Battle Underway: TV Networks Silent
Supreme Court Screws Small Online Businesses
FATCA, Place of Birth in Passports & Second Class Citizenship
How Many Pounds of Marijuana Are Being Sold in Colorado A Month?
Torture Memo Author John Yoo: President Can Wage War Without Declaration
How Dogecoin changed my perspective on cryptocurrency
Frothing Panic On School Bus Over ‘Power Ranger’ Toy Gun
Credit Suisse Says Governments Are Discouraging Gold Holdings – And What It Misses