“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
Related posts:
Feds fund $100,000 video game featuring female climate change 'superhero'
Charlie Shrem, Bitcoin entrepreneur, interviewed by Jeffrey Tucker
Wi-Fi Trashcans Now Silently Tracking Your Smartphone Data
New U.S. Tax Regime is "Devastating," Experts Say
The Debt Transfer Game; Slovakia Needs EUR 264M for ESM
Plunder-Lusting Quislings Seek to Repeal Posse Comitatus
Ecuador Bans Bitcoin, Plans Its Own State-Run Digital Money
Bill Gates: Flip-Flopping IP Hypocrite
Godfrey Bloom: Why the whole banking system is a scam
The Movement to Expunge Marijuana Convictions Picks Up Steam
Family Finds Sunken Gold Treasure Worth $300,000 Near Florida Coast
Bank of Finland Report Calls Digital Currency a “Fallacy”
Home Prices in Washington, D.C. Hit Record High
Nintendo kicks “Let’s Play” videos off YouTube then slaps ads on them
Boston’s Top Cop Warns Against “Police State”