
“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
Related posts:
FATCA: Breaking through Fear with a Swiss Referendum
White House: Obama has no plans to reschedule marijuana
61.2% Voted For Nobody
U.S. military judge: ‘Torture’ is not ‘relevant’ in Guantanamo cases
TWTC Stock Explodes In Another Case Of Mistaken Twitter Identity?
This is a coup: the Homeland Security takeover of US elections
Will Trump Make a Deal with the CIA on JFK Records?
Consumer demand for gold jumps 53%
Godfrey Bloom: Why the whole banking system is a scam
Justice Department Pays Linkedin $500,000 For Unlimited Access
Desktop Sized Atom Smasher Demonstrated
Man fires marijuana-wrapped arrow at Washington jail, says he was squirrel hunting
Dozens Of Homeland Security Employees On Terrorist Watch List
Millions of Chinese Smartphone Users Can’t Be Wrong
Tracking Inflation: Consumer Price Index vs. MIT Billion Prices Project